Full Text
Translation output
$-13 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CS (OS) 1354/2008
LA. Nos.8364/2008 & 4401/2010 MICROSOFT CORPORATION & ORS
Through: Mr. Nishchal Anand, Advocate.
CS (OS) 1354/2008
LA. Nos.8364/2008 & 4401/2010 MICROSOFT CORPORATION & ORS
Through: Mr. Nishchal Anand, Advocate.
VERSUS
COMPARE INFOBASE LTD. & ORS
Through: Mr. Saurabh Prakash with Mr. Siddharth Yadav, Advocates.
Through: Mr. Saurabh Prakash with Mr. Siddharth Yadav, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
09.04.2010 Plaintiffs Defendants I A No. 4401/2010 (0-23. R-3 CPC)
It is ajoint application filed under Order-23, Rule-3 CPC requesting the Court to record the compromise, terms of which are spelt out in paragraph Nos.2-9 of the application. The application is supported by the affidavit of plaintiffs constituted attorney and Managing Director/ChiefExecutive Officer ofthe defendant company who has deposed on behalf of all the defendants. The letter of authority/Resolution of the defendants authorizing the said Managing Director has been enclosed along with the application. Acopy of the order of Court dated 7.4.2008 allowing the petition for compromise arrangement in respect of the erstwhile company known as Turnkey
Software Projects Limited has also annexed to the application.
Having regard to the terms, the Court is satisfied that the parties have entered into
2010:DHC:14863 a lawful compromise.
LA. No.4401/2010 is allowed. rs (OS^ 1354/2008
In view of the order made today in I.A. No.4401/2010, the Suit is decreed in terms ofparagraphs 2-9 ofthe such application read with paragraph-57 (b), (c) &(d) of the plaint.
The defendant has handed over post dated cheque for the sum agreed i.e. 4.5
Lakhs, to the plaintiff.
The suit is decreed in the above terms. All the pending applications are also
0^ disposed of.
APRIL 09,2010 /vd/ S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J <6(6.) ^
>!,.>. jV -h-IVi-X ^ S-7 fk'\ :(C) h iV).
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CS (OS) 1354/2008
MICROSOFT CORPORATION AND ORS. Plaintiff
Through: Mr.Nishchal Anand, Advocate.
09.04.2010 Plaintiffs Defendants I A No. 4401/2010 (0-23. R-3 CPC)
It is ajoint application filed under Order-23, Rule-3 CPC requesting the Court to record the compromise, terms of which are spelt out in paragraph Nos.2-9 of the application. The application is supported by the affidavit of plaintiffs constituted attorney and Managing Director/ChiefExecutive Officer ofthe defendant company who has deposed on behalf of all the defendants. The letter of authority/Resolution of the defendants authorizing the said Managing Director has been enclosed along with the application. Acopy of the order of Court dated 7.4.2008 allowing the petition for compromise arrangement in respect of the erstwhile company known as Turnkey
Software Projects Limited has also annexed to the application.
Having regard to the terms, the Court is satisfied that the parties have entered into
2010:DHC:14863 a lawful compromise.
LA. No.4401/2010 is allowed. rs (OS^ 1354/2008
In view of the order made today in I.A. No.4401/2010, the Suit is decreed in terms ofparagraphs 2-9 ofthe such application read with paragraph-57 (b), (c) &(d) of the plaint.
The defendant has handed over post dated cheque for the sum agreed i.e. 4.5
Lakhs, to the plaintiff.
The suit is decreed in the above terms. All the pending applications are also
0^ disposed of.
APRIL 09,2010 /vd/ S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J <6(6.) ^
>!,.>. jV -h-IVi-X ^ S-7 fk'\ :(C) h iV).
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CS (OS) 1354/2008
MICROSOFT CORPORATION AND ORS. Plaintiff
Through: Mr.Nishchal Anand, Advocate.
VERSUS
COMPARE INFOBASE LTD. AND ORS. Defendant
Through: None.
Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
25.02.2011 Having considered the compromise application -1.A. No.4401/2010, itis clarified that the suit was decreed interms ofparagraph-2-9 ofthe application read with paragraph
57 (a) &(e) ofthe plaint. Adecree shall be drawn in terms ofthis clarification.
No further orders are called for.
FEBRUARY 25,2011 /vks/ S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
25.02.2011 Having considered the compromise application -1.A. No.4401/2010, itis clarified that the suit was decreed interms ofparagraph-2-9 ofthe application read with paragraph
57 (a) &(e) ofthe plaint. Adecree shall be drawn in terms ofthis clarification.
No further orders are called for.
FEBRUARY 25,2011 /vks/ S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
JUDGMENT