Full Text
JUDGMENT
4. o/o HIGH COURT OF DELHI RC.REV.3/2OtO MOHINDER PRAKASH KATARIA ... Petitioner Through: Mr. Anil Mishra, Advocate with Mr.Vikram Ganguly, Advocate
VERSUS
DEVKI NANDAN GOEL & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. S.N. Gupta, Advocate
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI T ORDER 1s.04.2010 CM 4O4l2O1O (exemption) Allowed, subject to just exceptions. r RC.REV. 3/2O1O and CM 4O3l2O1O The present revision petition is directed against an order dated 12.10.2009 passed by the Additional Rent Controller, dismissing the leave to defend application filed by the petitioner/tenant in reply to the eviction petition preferred by the respondents/landlords under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, in respect of a shop situated on the ground floor of the premises bearing No.13l31, Shakti Nagar, Delhi. while the matter was still at the stage of admission, appearance was entered on behalf of the respondents and a supplementary affidavit was filed by the petitioner to which, reply was filed by the \b 2010:DHC:11237 ib counsel for respondent No.5. After addressing arguments at some length, counsel for the respondents states that the impugned order dateQ L2.t0.2009 may be set aside and the matter may be remanded to enable the petitioner to file written statement to the eviction petition and the matter may be proceeded further in accordance with law. In view of the aforesaid statement made bf the counsel for the respondents, the impugned order dated L2.LO.2OO9 is set aside. The petitioner is granted leave to defend the eviction petition preferred by the respondents. The written statement shall be filed within four weeks with a copy to the counsel for the ,"rpont"nts, who shall file their rejoinders before the next date of hearing, fixed before the Additional Rent Controller. The revision petition is disposed of alongwith the pending application. The parties are directed to appear before the Additional Rent Controller on 31't May, 2010. A copy of this order shall be forwarded by thp Registry directly to the concerned court for perusal and compliance. APRIL rkb 15, 2010 HIMA KOHLI,J 2010:DHC:11237
JUDGMENT