Through Ms. Purnima Sethi, Advocate, Advocate v. Bark Bonded Warehouse

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No

2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? No

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.

1. This is an application by the Official Liquidator attached to this Court under S.446 of the Companies Act, 1956 for the recovery of an amount of Rs.15,419/- with interest @ 18% per annum, from the respondent M/s Barak Bonded Warehouse.

2. Pursuant to a petition filed on 14th December, 1999, M/s Jagatjit Brown Forman (India) Pvt. Ltd. was directed to be provisionally wound up on 19th December, 2003 and final winding up 2010:DHC:2138 orders were passed by this Court on 12th January, 2005. The Official Liquidator attached to this Court was appointed as its liquidator.

3. The company in liquidation, i.e M/s Jagatjit Brown Forman (India) Pvt. Ltd., was in the business of manufacture, sale and export of liquor and alcoholic beverages and other consumer products.

4. On examination of the statement of affairs filed by the Ex- Directors under S.454 of the Companies Act, 1956 along with a list of debtors, the Official Liquidator discovered that an amount of Rs. 15,419/- is due to the company in liquidation from the respondent. The Official Liquidator has, therefore, moved this application praying for an order of recovery of the said amount, along with interest @18% per annum till its realization in favour of the applicant, against the respondent.

5. There has been no appearance on behalf of the respondent so far. The affidavit of service of the respondent has since been filed. Consequently, the respondent was directed to be proceeded ex-parte, and the matter was adjourned to 10th March, 2010. On 12th April, 2010, the applicant’s evidence was completed and arguments were heard.

6. An affidavit of Shri Sudhir Kapoor, Assistant Official Liquidator was filed on 6th April, 2010 by way of evidence in support of the application. Ex.PW1/1 is a copy of an extract from the statement of affairs filed by the Ex-Directors. Ex.PW1/2 is a copy of the ledger account maintained by the company in liquidation, pertaining to the respondent. In that ledger, a debit balance of Rs. 15,419/- is reflected. Ex.PW1/3 is a copy of the demand notice dated 22nd July, 2005 sent by the Official Liquidator to the respondent under S.446 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking recovery of Rs. 15,419/-. Ex.PW1/4 is a copy of the AD card issued by the Department of Posts, evidencing the fact that the aforesaid notice was duly served on the respondent. The respondent has not bothered to respond to the notice of demand.

7. It is stated by counsel for the OL that this claim was due to the company in liquidation on 31st March, 1999 and is within limitation.

8. There is no defence to the claim. The amount claimed stands proved.

9. Consequently, the respondent is directed to pay an amount of Rs. 15,419/- to the applicant, along with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of the application till the date of realization of the amount in favour of the applicant.

10. The application is disposed of.

SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J. APRIL 19, 2010