Vinod Kumar Mehta and Anr v. Anjana Narula

Delhi High Court · 22 Jul 2024 · 2024:DHC:5417
Manoj Jain
FAO 166/2016
2024:DHC:5417
civil appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court disposed of the appeal as settled following an amicable settlement reached through court-mediated conciliation.

Full Text
Translation output
FAO 166/2016 1
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 22nd July, 2024
FAO 166/2016 & CM APPL. 14017/2016
VINOD KUMAR MEHTA AND ANR .....Appellant
Through: Mrs. Kawaljit Kochar, Ms. Senjul Mehta and Mr. Deepanshu, Advocates along
WITH
Mr. Varun Mehta, party in person
VERSUS
ANJANA NARULA .....Respondent
Through: Mr. Hitesh Vadhwa, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
JUDGMENT
(oral)

1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the parties have informed that matter has been amicably settled and the copy of settlement agreement dated 18.07.2024 which had taken place under the aegis of Delhi High Court Mediation & Conciliation Centre, Delhi High Court, New Delhi is already on record.

2. Both the learned counsel have assured that parties would abide by the terms of the settlement.

3. Pursuant to such settlement terms, three drafts of Rs. 13,00,000/- (Rs. Thirteen Lacs) have been handed by the learned counsel for respondent to the learned counsel for appellant and simultaneously, the keys of the property in question have been handed over by learned counsel for respondents along with GPA. FAO 166/2016 2

4. Both the parties undertake that they would take further steps in terms of the settlement and the suit in question would also be accordingly withdrawn.

5. Learned counsel for the appellant states that in view of the settlement, appeal in question may be disposed of.

6. Resultantly, appeal stands disposed of as settled in terms of the settlement agreement dated 18.07.2024.

JUDGE JULY 22, 2024