Full Text
Translation output
# 08.11.2010 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Bhardwaj, Adv. for the Petitioner.
Mr. Arvind Gupta, APP for the State along with SI Jai
Bha^aj, Spl. Staff, N.E. Distt.
Petitioner no. 2 in person.
» + CrL M.C. 3470/2010 Petitioner and respondent no. 2 are working in the same organization and are friends. Dispute arose between them with regard to some financial transaction which led to registration of present FIR against the petitioner. Now, petitioner and respondent no.2 have settled the matter with the intervention of common friends, inasmuch as, they want to maintain harmonious relations with each other in future. Respondent no.2, who is present in Court today, states that he has no objection if the. FIR in question is quashed.
• Since both the parties have settled their disputes amicably, I am of the view that no fruitful purpose would be served by compelling the parties to continue to litigate a protracted trial. Accordingly, in larger interest, FIR No.104/2007 under Sections 420/406 IPC registered at
Police Station Yamuna Vihar/Gokul Puri and consequent proceedings emanating therefrorn are quashed.
\ 2010:DHC:15282 Petition is disposed of in the above terms.
Dasti.
NOVEMBER 08, 2010 ga A.K. PATHAK, J.
I
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C. 3470/2010
DEVENDER SINGH Petitioner
Through: Mr. V.K. Malik, Adv.
Mr. Arvind Gupta, APP for the State along with SI Jai
Bha^aj, Spl. Staff, N.E. Distt.
Petitioner no. 2 in person.
» + CrL M.C. 3470/2010 Petitioner and respondent no. 2 are working in the same organization and are friends. Dispute arose between them with regard to some financial transaction which led to registration of present FIR against the petitioner. Now, petitioner and respondent no.2 have settled the matter with the intervention of common friends, inasmuch as, they want to maintain harmonious relations with each other in future. Respondent no.2, who is present in Court today, states that he has no objection if the. FIR in question is quashed.
• Since both the parties have settled their disputes amicably, I am of the view that no fruitful purpose would be served by compelling the parties to continue to litigate a protracted trial. Accordingly, in larger interest, FIR No.104/2007 under Sections 420/406 IPC registered at
Police Station Yamuna Vihar/Gokul Puri and consequent proceedings emanating therefrorn are quashed.
\ 2010:DHC:15282 Petition is disposed of in the above terms.
Dasti.
NOVEMBER 08, 2010 ga A.K. PATHAK, J.
I
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C. 3470/2010
DEVENDER SINGH Petitioner
Through: Mr. V.K. Malik, Adv.
VERSUS
STATE & ANR Respondent
Through; None.
Through; None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK
01.06.2012 LA. No. 7177/2012 (u/Sec. 482 Cr.P.C.)
It is pointed that a typographical error has crept in the order dated November, 2010 wherein FIR number has been inadvertently mentioned as "104/2007" instead of "104/2010".
Error is rectified. Now, in line 4 ofpara 2 of the order dated S""
November, 2010, FIR number shall be read as "104/2010" instead of "104/2007".
Application is disposed of in the above terms.
A.K. PATHAK, J.
JUNE 01, 2012 ga
01.06.2012 LA. No. 7177/2012 (u/Sec. 482 Cr.P.C.)
It is pointed that a typographical error has crept in the order dated November, 2010 wherein FIR number has been inadvertently mentioned as "104/2007" instead of "104/2010".
Error is rectified. Now, in line 4 ofpara 2 of the order dated S""
November, 2010, FIR number shall be read as "104/2010" instead of "104/2007".
Application is disposed of in the above terms.
A.K. PATHAK, J.
JUNE 01, 2012 ga
JUDGMENT