SATINDER PAL SINGH ANAND @ CHANI ANAND v. ARVIND KANODIA

Delhi High Court · 08 Nov 2010 · 2010:DHC:12886
FAO No.348/2009; FAO No.349/2009; FAO No.350/2009
2010:DHC:12886
civil appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

The court dismissed the appeals as infructuous following a compromise between the parties and condoned the delay in filing the appeals.

Full Text
Translation output
o/o 08.11 .2OLO
#1-3.
Present: Mr. Ranjan Rai, Adv. for the appellant with
Mr.Satinder Pal Singh, Appellant in person..
None for the respondent.
+ C.M.L6327 ^n}9(delaA.r inFlAO 348 ^OO9
C.M.L6329 | 2OO9 @elaA) in F|:O 349 | 2OO9
*
Deiay in filing the appeals is condoned and the applications are allowed and disposed of.
FAO No.348/2OO9 & C.M.16328/2O09
FAO No.349/2OO9 & C.M.1633O/2O09
FAO No.35O/2OO9 & C.M.16332/2OO9
JUDGMENT

1. Mr.Ranjan Rai, Advocate is appearing for the appellant who has filed his vakalantnama today in Court itself. The vakalatnama is taken on record. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the parties have arrived at a compromise and in view of the compromise, the appellant, who is present in Court, does not wish to press these appeals.

2. Accordingly, the appeals as well as the applications are dismissed as having become infructuous in view of the compromised reached between the appellant and the respondent.

3. No costs.

4. Copy of this order be sent to the trial Court.

5. TCR be also sent back.