Full Text
Translation output
30.
$- {< \3 HIGH COURT OF DELHI w.P.(c) 2s6/2009
VI/S CHOPRA MARKETING PVT.LTD. ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Rajat Wadhwa & Mr. Amulya Dhingr4 Advocates.
VETSUS
SH. AJAY GUPTA & ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Sanat Kumar, Advocate for R- 1to5
Mr. Ajay Arora & Mr. Kapil Dutt4 Advocates for MCD.
$- {< \3 HIGH COURT OF DELHI w.P.(c) 2s6/2009
VI/S CHOPRA MARKETING PVT.LTD. ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Rajat Wadhwa & Mr. Amulya Dhingr4 Advocates.
VETSUS
SH. AJAY GUPTA & ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Sanat Kumar, Advocate for R- 1to5
Mr. Ajay Arora & Mr. Kapil Dutt4 Advocates for MCD.
AND
31. w.P.(c) 2s7/2009 IWS CHOPRA MARKETING PVT.LTD. ..... Petitioner
Dhirgtq Advocates
31. w.P.(c) 2s7/2009 IWS CHOPRA MARKETING PVT.LTD. ..... Petitioner
Dhirgtq Advocates
VERSUS
1to5 Mr. Ajay Arora & Mr. Kapil Dutt4 {,llD 32. w.P.(c) 2s8/2009
&-.
.l -a Dhingr4 Advocates. t/- 2010:DHC:13869 \Y
VETSUS
1to5 Mr. day Arora & Mr. Kapil Dutt4 AND 33. w.P.(c) 2s912009
Nd/S CHOPRA MARKETING PVT.LTD. ..... Petitioner
Dhiogtq Advocates.
&-.
.l -a Dhingr4 Advocates. t/- 2010:DHC:13869 \Y
VETSUS
1to5 Mr. day Arora & Mr. Kapil Dutt4 AND 33. w.P.(c) 2s912009
Nd/S CHOPRA MARKETING PVT.LTD. ..... Petitioner
Dhiogtq Advocates.
VERSUS
SH. AJAY GUPTA & ORS.
Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Sanat Kumar, Advocate for R-
1to5 Mr. Ajay Arora & Mr. Kapil Duttq AND 34. w.P.(c) 260/2009
Dhiogtq Advocates.
VETSUS
SH. AJAY GUPTA & ORS. .... Respondents 1to5 Mr. Ajay Arora & Mr. Kapil Duff4
2/- I ' 1.
2.
Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Sanat Kumar, Advocate for R-
1to5 Mr. Ajay Arora & Mr. Kapil Duttq AND 34. w.P.(c) 260/2009
Dhiogtq Advocates.
VETSUS
SH. AJAY GUPTA & ORS. .... Respondents 1to5 Mr. Ajay Arora & Mr. Kapil Duff4
2/- I ' 1.
2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJTV SAHAI ENDLAW
09.11.20L0 The counsels have mentioned the matter.
The counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw these petitions to avail the alternative remedy and in which respect. objection has been taken
.by the respondents no.1 to 5 in their counter affidavits. The counsel for the respondents no.1 to 5 and the counsel for the respondent no.7 MCD have no objection.
09.11.20L0 The counsels have mentioned the matter.
The counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw these petitions to avail the alternative remedy and in which respect. objection has been taken
.by the respondents no.1 to 5 in their counter affidavits. The counsel for the respondents no.1 to 5 and the counsel for the respondent no.7 MCD have no objection.
ORDER
3. The petitions are accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to avail alternative remedy in accordance with law. No order as to costs.
SAHAI ENDLAWJ NOVEMBER PP.. Frr/* 4, a 3/-