IWS Chopra Marketing Pvt Ltd v. Sh. Ajay Gupta & Ors.

Delhi High Court · 09 Nov 2010 · 2010:DHC:13866
Rajtv Sahai Endlaw
W.P.(C) 2561/2009
2010:DHC:13866
administrative appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw multiple writ petitions to pursue alternative remedies, dismissing the petitions without costs.

Full Text
Translation output
J f
, \2 ,/', 30.
$-
*INTHEHIGHcoURToFDELHIATNEwDELHI
+ w.P.(C) 2s612009
IWS CHOPRA MARKETING PVT'LTD' ""' Petitioner
Through: Mr. Rajat Wadhwa & Mr' Amulya
Dhingr4 Advocates.
VERSUS
SH. AJAY GUPTA & ORS' ""' Resp'ondents
Through: IvIr' Sanat Kumar, Advocate for R-
1to5
Mr. AjaY Arora & Mr. KaPil Dutt4
Advocates for MCD.
AND
31.
+ w.P.(C) 2s712009
Through: Mr. Rajat Wadhwa & I\ft' Amulya
Dhiogtq Advocates.
VERSUS
SH. AJAY GUPTA & ORS' ""' Respondents
Through: I\ft. Sanat Kumar, Advocate for R-
1to5
Mr. Ajay tuora & Mr. KaPil Dutt4
AND
32.
+ w.P.(c) 2s812009
Through: Mr. Rajat Wadhwa & Mr' Amulya
Dhingr4 Advocates. 1/-
2010:DHC:13866
l\
VERSUS
SH. AJAY GUPTA & ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Sanat Kumar, Advocate for R-
1to5
Mr. Ajay Arora & Mr. KaPil Dutt4
AND
33.
+ w.P.(c) 2se12009
NI/S CHOPRA MARKETING PVT.LTD. ..... PEtitiONET
Through: Mr. Rajat Wadhwa & NIr. Amulya
Dhirgrq Advocates
VERSUS
SH. AJAY GUPTA & ORS. .... Respondents
Through: Mr. Sanat Kumar, Advocate for R-
1to5
Mr. Ajay Arora & Mr. KaPil Dutt4
AND
34.
+ w.P.(c) 26012009 f'
IWS CHOPRA MARKETING PVT.LTD. ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Rajat Wadhwa & NIr. Amulya
Dhirgtq Advocates.
VERSUS
SH. AJAY GUPTA & ORS. .... Respondents
Through: Mr. Sanat Kumat, Advocate for R-
1to5
Mr. Ajay Arora & NIr. Kapil Dutt4
. Advocates for MCD.
2/_
{ o
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJTV SAHAI ENDLAW
09.1L.2010
ORDER

1. The counsels have mentioned the matter. '2. The counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw these petitions to avail the alternative remedy and in which respect objection has been taken by the respondents no.l to 5 in their counter affidavits. The counsel for the respondents no.1 to 5 and the counsel for the respondentno.T MCD have no objection.

3. The petitions are accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to avail alternative remedy in accordance with law. No order as to costs.

SAHAI ENDLAW,J NOVEMBER 09,20 PP.. a ( s/-