Ashok Raheja v. Prakashwati Gupta

High Court of Rc · 09 Nov 2010 · 2010:DHC:11533
Veena Birbal
RC.REV. 22912010 & CM 1727sl2010
2010:DHC:11533
civil other

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court disposed of the eviction-related revision petition by consent, granting the petitioner time to vacate the premises and restraining eviction execution until then.

Full Text
Translation output
16.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF
RC.REV.229I2OLO
ASHOK RAHEJA
Through:
VCTSUS
DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Mr s.K ahattacha?i5\i1in"'
Mr. Niraj Bobby, Adv. rt}
PRAKASHWATI GUPTA ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Sunil Malhotra with
Ms. Sonali Malhotra, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTTCE VEENA BTRBAL
09.LL.2010
RC.REV. 22912010 & CM 1727sl2010
After some arguments counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner is not pressing the petition on merits and prays that petitioner be given some time to vacate the premises in question.
The respondent is present in person. Under the instructions from the respondent, the counsel for the respondent states that the respondent has no objection in granting time to the petitioner up to 10.05.2013 and the respondent will not execute the eviction order till then. ln view of above statement given by the counsel for parties the present petition and pending application stand disposed of. The petitioner is granted time till 10.05.2013 to o/o
2010:DHC:11533
/n vacate the premises in question subject to filing of usual V undertaking by'the petitioner within two weeks with a copy ," I the respondent. In the meanwhile, the respondent shall not execute the eviction order till the next date of hearing.
Renotify on 01.12.2010. The parties to appear in person on the next date. u-t-
VEENA BIRBALJ
NOVEMBER 09, 2O1O srb
-U*W5Afr/A
2010:DHC:11533
JUDGMENT