Bani Singh v. State & Anr.

Delhi High Court · 01 Nov 2010 · 2010:DHC:9495
Mukta Gupta
CRL.REV.P. 741/2007
2010:DHC:9495
criminal appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed a revision petition challenging discharge under the SC/ST Act as withdrawn following a settlement between the parties.

Full Text
Translation output
5#
$-
*
+
OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI..... Petitioner
Mr. Lalit Kr. Laam. Advocate ..... Respondents
Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP for the State with Insp.
J.D. Meena, PS Sangam Vihar, Delhi.
Mr. Anil K. Gujral, Advocate for R-2 to 4.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA oh 01.112010
Leamed counsel for the Petitioner savs that in this case the Resoondent was already discharged for offences committed under the Provision of Section 3 of the
Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The present Revision Petition is against the said order of discharge. The parties have entered into a settlement and in terms of the settlement, as recorded in order dated
20tr'May, 2}7},leamed counsel for the Petitioner wants to withdraw the present
Revision Petition. Leamed counsel for the Petitioner states that he would also withdraw his complaint pending before the learned Metropolitan Magisffate for the offences relating to IPC.
In view of the statement of leamed counsel for the Petitioner. the Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
IN THE IIIGH COURT
CRL.REV .P . 7 41 12007
BANI SINGH
Through:
VERSUS
STATE & ANR.
Through:
/lrtt"X,fr^.-ffi-
N
MUKTA GUPTA. J.
NOVEMBER 01, 2010
2010:DHC:9495
JUDGMENT