Full Text
Translation output
i $-31 HIGH COURT OF DELHI CRL.M.C. 354212010
SYED AKHTAR ARSHAD
Through Mr. T.A. Mir, Adv. VETSUS STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
,.... Petitioner ..... Respondent
Through Mr. Sunil Sharma, Addl. PP for the State
SYED AKHTAR ARSHAD
Through Mr. T.A. Mir, Adv. VETSUS STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
,.... Petitioner ..... Respondent
Through Mr. Sunil Sharma, Addl. PP for the State
CORAM:
JUSTICE SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA
19.11.2010 . The petitioner is assailing an order of learned ASJ passed in revision whereby the order of learned MM was modified and the petitioner was given liberty to leave India during pendency of the case subject to his furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50.00 lakh supported by original documents in respect of any property bearing the value of Rs.
50.00 lakh or above.
The petitioner states that he does not have any property in Delhi. He was residing at Madras.
The petition is given liberty to submit original documents of any residential or commercial property situated in lndia of which petitioner or his close relative/friend is owner provided the same is not situated in some remote village. The property should be situaied in some city and the person whose property is given as surety shall submit before learned MM an undertaking that incase the petitioner does not return, the court would be at liberty to dispose of the same and the sale proceed shall go to the State.
Dasti.
NOVEMBER 19,2010 acm ;
2010:DHC:8782
19.11.2010 . The petitioner is assailing an order of learned ASJ passed in revision whereby the order of learned MM was modified and the petitioner was given liberty to leave India during pendency of the case subject to his furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50.00 lakh supported by original documents in respect of any property bearing the value of Rs.
50.00 lakh or above.
The petitioner states that he does not have any property in Delhi. He was residing at Madras.
The petition is given liberty to submit original documents of any residential or commercial property situated in lndia of which petitioner or his close relative/friend is owner provided the same is not situated in some remote village. The property should be situaied in some city and the person whose property is given as surety shall submit before learned MM an undertaking that incase the petitioner does not return, the court would be at liberty to dispose of the same and the sale proceed shall go to the State.
Dasti.
NOVEMBER 19,2010 acm ;
2010:DHC:8782
JUDGMENT