Full Text
Translation output
41.
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
TR.P.(C.) 69/2010
GARDENIA ESTATES PVT LTD .... Petitioner
Through: Mr. P.D. Gupta with Mr. Kama! Gupta, Adv.
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
TR.P.(C.) 69/2010
GARDENIA ESTATES PVT LTD .... Petitioner
Through: Mr. P.D. Gupta with Mr. Kama! Gupta, Adv.
VERSUS
MADHU GUPTA Respondent
Through: None.
Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL
23.11.2010
23.11.2010
TR.P.(C.) 69/2010 & CM 20908/2010
Present is a transfer petition filed under Section 24 of
CPC praying for transfer of eviction petition filed by the petitioner from Saket courts to Patiala House Courts.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that an eviction petition- bearing No.E-81/2010 was filed against the respondent in respect of property at 138-A, Golf Links, New Delhi, before the Rent Controller, Patiala House Courts wherein the respondent has been served and has also filed a leave to defend application. The petitioner has also filed his reply thereto. Thereafter on the starting of Courts at Saket the aforesaid petition was transferred there and is pending disposal before Ld. CCJ/ARC/ACJ (South District) at Saket courts. It is stated that before the Saket court, the respondent
2010:DHC:15632 has taken an objection stating that the petitioner's eviction petition ought to be tried by the Rent. Controller at Patiala
House Court and not at Saket Courts, owing to territorial jurisdiction and the next date fixed for hearing the said objection is 04.12.2010.
It is submitted that to avoid any technical objection, the petitioner requests that the abovesaid eviction petition may be transferred to Patiala House courts.
It may be mentioned that the matter is listed for hearing at Saket Court on 04.12.2010. The controversy of jurisdiction is still pending consideration before learned ARC at Saket
Courts. Under these circumstances, it will not be appropriate to pass any order on this petition, at this stage.
Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed.
VEENA BIRBALJ
^ NOVEMBER 23, 2010 srb 2010:DHC:15632
Present is a transfer petition filed under Section 24 of
CPC praying for transfer of eviction petition filed by the petitioner from Saket courts to Patiala House Courts.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that an eviction petition- bearing No.E-81/2010 was filed against the respondent in respect of property at 138-A, Golf Links, New Delhi, before the Rent Controller, Patiala House Courts wherein the respondent has been served and has also filed a leave to defend application. The petitioner has also filed his reply thereto. Thereafter on the starting of Courts at Saket the aforesaid petition was transferred there and is pending disposal before Ld. CCJ/ARC/ACJ (South District) at Saket courts. It is stated that before the Saket court, the respondent
2010:DHC:15632 has taken an objection stating that the petitioner's eviction petition ought to be tried by the Rent. Controller at Patiala
House Court and not at Saket Courts, owing to territorial jurisdiction and the next date fixed for hearing the said objection is 04.12.2010.
It is submitted that to avoid any technical objection, the petitioner requests that the abovesaid eviction petition may be transferred to Patiala House courts.
It may be mentioned that the matter is listed for hearing at Saket Court on 04.12.2010. The controversy of jurisdiction is still pending consideration before learned ARC at Saket
Courts. Under these circumstances, it will not be appropriate to pass any order on this petition, at this stage.
Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed.
VEENA BIRBALJ
^ NOVEMBER 23, 2010 srb 2010:DHC:15632
JUDGMENT