Full Text
Translation output
#39
16.11.2010
Present: Mr.S.Satyanarayana, Advocateforthe petitioner.
Mr.R.N.Vats, APP for the respondent No. l/State.
Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Advocate for the respondent No. 2.
+Crl.M.A. 17365/2O1O (for exemption)
Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
1^
Crl. M. C.3 55O/2O1O
This is a petition seeking quashing of FIR No.684/2006 under
Sections 135/169 of Electricity Act read with Section 379 lPC, P.S. Kalkaji on the ground that parties have settled the matter in Mega Lok Adalat and pursuant to the settlement, the entire settled amount has been paid by the petitioner.
Learned Sh. Sunil Fernandes, Advocate appearing for the gsRondent No. 2, on instructions, submits that the petitioner has paid the settled amount as per the settlement arrived in Mega Lok Adalat and in ii ui"* of that, respondent No. 2 has no objection if the FIR is quashed.
Learned Sh. R.N.Vats, APP for the respondent No. 1 also submits that State has no objection if the FIR is quashed in view of the settlement arrived in Mega Lok Adalat.
Since the parties have arrived at a settlement in Mega Lok Adalat, I feel that no useful purpose shall be served by keeping the instant FIR'as well as the proceedings arising out of the same alive. Accordingly, FIR NO. 2010:DHC:8560
/A--
68412006, P.S. Kalkaji as well as the proceedings arising out the same are hereby quashed.
Petition stands disposed of.
'L?'
!
NOVEMBER 16, 2O1O
C akb
(AJrr BHARTHOKE)
JUDGE
,r t
2010:DHC:8560
16.11.2010
Present: Mr.S.Satyanarayana, Advocateforthe petitioner.
Mr.R.N.Vats, APP for the respondent No. l/State.
Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Advocate for the respondent No. 2.
+Crl.M.A. 17365/2O1O (for exemption)
Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
1^
Crl. M. C.3 55O/2O1O
This is a petition seeking quashing of FIR No.684/2006 under
Sections 135/169 of Electricity Act read with Section 379 lPC, P.S. Kalkaji on the ground that parties have settled the matter in Mega Lok Adalat and pursuant to the settlement, the entire settled amount has been paid by the petitioner.
Learned Sh. Sunil Fernandes, Advocate appearing for the gsRondent No. 2, on instructions, submits that the petitioner has paid the settled amount as per the settlement arrived in Mega Lok Adalat and in ii ui"* of that, respondent No. 2 has no objection if the FIR is quashed.
Learned Sh. R.N.Vats, APP for the respondent No. 1 also submits that State has no objection if the FIR is quashed in view of the settlement arrived in Mega Lok Adalat.
Since the parties have arrived at a settlement in Mega Lok Adalat, I feel that no useful purpose shall be served by keeping the instant FIR'as well as the proceedings arising out of the same alive. Accordingly, FIR NO. 2010:DHC:8560
/A--
68412006, P.S. Kalkaji as well as the proceedings arising out the same are hereby quashed.
Petition stands disposed of.
'L?'
!
NOVEMBER 16, 2O1O
C akb
(AJrr BHARTHOKE)
JUDGE
,r t
2010:DHC:8560
JUDGMENT