Full Text
Translation output
$-38 HIGH COURT OF DELHI CRL.M.C. 359612010, Crl.
M.A. No. 1750112010
PRAN PAHUJA
Through Mr. Adiya Kala, Adv. ..... Petitioner t'
{ STATE ..... Respondent
Through Mr. Sunil Sharma, Addl. PP for the State
GORAM:
JUSTICE SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA l ORDER 19.11.2010
The petitioner is aggrieved by an order of learned MM whereby the prayer of the petitioner under Section 156(3) Cr. P.C. for registration of FIR was turned down by the
MM and the MM thought it proper to record evidence himself unber Section 200 Cr. p.C.
The Revision against the order of MM, filed by the petitioner before the Court of learned ASJ did not succeed. The petitioner oK norr before this court.
It is the discretion of the MM either to get an FIR registered on a complaint made by the petitioner or to proceed in accordance with other provisions of Cr. P.C. and record evidence of the petitioner. As the learned MM has chosen other course, this Court finds no jurisdictional error or illegality in the order of MM or ASJ. The petition stands dismissed.
The case of the petitioner is fixed before the Court of MM for evidence on
February 11, 2011. The petitioner shall produce entire evidence before the Court of MM on the date and the learned MM shall record evidence as produced by the petitioner.
T
// sHrv ,({4*I*DHTNGRA,J NOVEMBER 19,2010 I / acm
2010:DHC:8822
M.A. No. 1750112010
PRAN PAHUJA
Through Mr. Adiya Kala, Adv. ..... Petitioner t'
{ STATE ..... Respondent
Through Mr. Sunil Sharma, Addl. PP for the State
GORAM:
JUSTICE SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA l ORDER 19.11.2010
The petitioner is aggrieved by an order of learned MM whereby the prayer of the petitioner under Section 156(3) Cr. P.C. for registration of FIR was turned down by the
MM and the MM thought it proper to record evidence himself unber Section 200 Cr. p.C.
The Revision against the order of MM, filed by the petitioner before the Court of learned ASJ did not succeed. The petitioner oK norr before this court.
It is the discretion of the MM either to get an FIR registered on a complaint made by the petitioner or to proceed in accordance with other provisions of Cr. P.C. and record evidence of the petitioner. As the learned MM has chosen other course, this Court finds no jurisdictional error or illegality in the order of MM or ASJ. The petition stands dismissed.
The case of the petitioner is fixed before the Court of MM for evidence on
February 11, 2011. The petitioner shall produce entire evidence before the Court of MM on the date and the learned MM shall record evidence as produced by the petitioner.
T
// sHrv ,({4*I*DHTNGRA,J NOVEMBER 19,2010 I / acm
2010:DHC:8822
JUDGMENT