Full Text
Translation output
$-19 IN THE HIGH c·ouRT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
W.P.(CRL) 1242/2010
PREM KUMAR
PREM KUMAR
VERSUS
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Lakshuta Sethi, Advocate STATE OF THE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sachdeva, ASC for the State
Through: Mr. Lakshuta Sethi, Advocate STATE OF THE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sachdeva, ASC for the State
CORAM:
JUSTICE SHIV NARAYAN DHJNGRA
12.11.2010 This petition has been filed for grant of parole after the application of the applicant for grant of parole was dismissed by the State. The applicant's appeal was dismissed by this Court on 291 h January, 2010. I consider that to enable him to file an
SLP in tlie Supreme Court, parole should P.e granted. It is directed that the applicant be released on parole for a period of one month from the date of his release on his executing personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Jail Superintendent. He shall file before the Jail Superintendent his
' · address in Delhi where he will live during the parole period and shall also report once a week to SHO PS Okhla Industrial Area. He shall surrender after expiry of parole period and submit a copy of SLP, so filed by him to Jail Superintendent.
With above directions, the petition is allowed. k
SHIV NARA~DHJNGRA,J NOVEMBER 12, 2010 vn 2010:DHC:13473
._...· 4#$~ (Yo HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(CRL) 1242/2010
PREM KUMAR ..... Petitioner
12.11.2010 This petition has been filed for grant of parole after the application of the applicant for grant of parole was dismissed by the State. The applicant's appeal was dismissed by this Court on 291 h January, 2010. I consider that to enable him to file an
SLP in tlie Supreme Court, parole should P.e granted. It is directed that the applicant be released on parole for a period of one month from the date of his release on his executing personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Jail Superintendent. He shall file before the Jail Superintendent his
' · address in Delhi where he will live during the parole period and shall also report once a week to SHO PS Okhla Industrial Area. He shall surrender after expiry of parole period and submit a copy of SLP, so filed by him to Jail Superintendent.
With above directions, the petition is allowed. k
SHIV NARA~DHJNGRA,J NOVEMBER 12, 2010 vn 2010:DHC:13473
._...· 4#$~ (Yo HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(CRL) 1242/2010
PREM KUMAR ..... Petitioner
VERSUS
Through: Mr. A.J. Bhambhani, Ms. Nisha Bhambhani and Mr. Victor Ananthem, Advocates.
STATE OF THE NCT OF DELI-II ..... Respondent
STATE OF THE NCT OF DELI-II ..... Respondent
CORAM:
Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, Additional Standing Counsel (Crl.)
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
25.04.2011 Crl.
M.A. No. 18523/2010 in W.P. (Crl.) No. 1242/2010
The Petitioner has been produced in custody today. He states that his native village is around 150 Kms towards eastern side of Lucknow. He further states that his wife and children are staying along with his brother and besides their own house they have landed properties. Since the
Petitioner has not been released because he has not in a position to furnish personal bond in the sum of ~50,000/- with one surety of the like amount, order dated 1ih November, 2010 is modified to the extent that the Petitioner will now fumish a personal bond in the sum of ~25,000/- with one surety of
.· -, ../ the like amount, subject to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court. The l order dated lih November, 2010 is further modified to the extent that during the period of parole the Petitioner will report to the SHO, PS Khurare, District Ghonda, U.P. once a week on every Monday at 4.00 P.M.
Application is disposed of.
Copy of the order be communicated to the Petitioner through the
Superintendent, Tihar Jail and also to SHO, PS Khurare, District Ghonda, U.P.
APRIL 25,2011 vn ~fe_ MUKTA GUPTA, J.
Page 2 of2
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
25.04.2011 Crl.
M.A. No. 18523/2010 in W.P. (Crl.) No. 1242/2010
The Petitioner has been produced in custody today. He states that his native village is around 150 Kms towards eastern side of Lucknow. He further states that his wife and children are staying along with his brother and besides their own house they have landed properties. Since the
Petitioner has not been released because he has not in a position to furnish personal bond in the sum of ~50,000/- with one surety of the like amount, order dated 1ih November, 2010 is modified to the extent that the Petitioner will now fumish a personal bond in the sum of ~25,000/- with one surety of
.· -, ../ the like amount, subject to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court. The l order dated lih November, 2010 is further modified to the extent that during the period of parole the Petitioner will report to the SHO, PS Khurare, District Ghonda, U.P. once a week on every Monday at 4.00 P.M.
Application is disposed of.
Copy of the order be communicated to the Petitioner through the
Superintendent, Tihar Jail and also to SHO, PS Khurare, District Ghonda, U.P.
APRIL 25,2011 vn ~fe_ MUKTA GUPTA, J.
Page 2 of2
JUDGMENT