Full Text
Translation output
J.
#
/o 12.11.2010
Present: Mr. V.K. Kalra, Adv. for the Petitioners.
Mr. M.P. Singh, APP for the State with SI Bihari Lal, P.S. Hauz Quazi, Delhi.
Respondent No.2 in person.
+ Crl. M.C. No. 3523/2010
*
\
Petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 were married as per
Hindu rites and ceremonies sometime in the year 2007. Due to matrimonial acrimony, they could not live together for long. On the complaint of respondent No. 2, FIR in question was registered at police station Hauz Quazi. Petitioner Nos. 2 to 6 are relatives of petitioner No. 1. They approached the Additional Sessions Judge seeking anticipatory bail. During pendency of the bail application, matter was referred to Mediation Center, Tis Hazari Courts, where both the parties have amicably settled their disputes. Terms of settlement have been recorded in the proceeding-sheets 24th February, 2010 (Annexure A). Parties shall remain bound by the terms of settlement. In fact, they have obtained decree of divorce by mutual consent on 25th September, 2010. In terms of the
2010:DHC:9906 settlement, remaining settled amount of ~65,000 I- has been paid by petitioner No. 1 to respondent No.2 in cash in the Court.
In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties and in the larger interest, I quash the FIR No.120I 2009 under
Sections 498-AI 406I 34 IPC registered at police station Hauz
Quazi and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom.
Petition is disposed of in the above terms.
Dasti.
NOVEMBER 12, 2010 rb
~ ~~~
KP~AK,J.
2010:DHC:9906
Present: Mr. V.K. Kalra, Adv. for the Petitioners.
Mr. M.P. Singh, APP for the State with SI Bihari Lal, P.S. Hauz Quazi, Delhi.
Respondent No.2 in person.
+ Crl. M.C. No. 3523/2010
*
\
Petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 were married as per
Hindu rites and ceremonies sometime in the year 2007. Due to matrimonial acrimony, they could not live together for long. On the complaint of respondent No. 2, FIR in question was registered at police station Hauz Quazi. Petitioner Nos. 2 to 6 are relatives of petitioner No. 1. They approached the Additional Sessions Judge seeking anticipatory bail. During pendency of the bail application, matter was referred to Mediation Center, Tis Hazari Courts, where both the parties have amicably settled their disputes. Terms of settlement have been recorded in the proceeding-sheets 24th February, 2010 (Annexure A). Parties shall remain bound by the terms of settlement. In fact, they have obtained decree of divorce by mutual consent on 25th September, 2010. In terms of the
2010:DHC:9906 settlement, remaining settled amount of ~65,000 I- has been paid by petitioner No. 1 to respondent No.2 in cash in the Court.
In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties and in the larger interest, I quash the FIR No.120I 2009 under
Sections 498-AI 406I 34 IPC registered at police station Hauz
Quazi and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom.
Petition is disposed of in the above terms.
Dasti.
NOVEMBER 12, 2010 rb
~ ~~~
KP~AK,J.
2010:DHC:9906
JUDGMENT