Full Text
Translation output
, •
#31
12.11.2010
Present: Mr.H.K.Shekher, Advocate with Mr. Ranjeet Singh, Advocate for the petitioners with petitioner No. !/complainant & petitioner No. 2 in person.
Mr.R.N.Vats, APP for the respondent/State with 10 51
C.L.Meena, P.S. Anand Vihar.
+Cri.M.A.l7260/2010 (for exemption)
Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
Cri.M.C. 3525/2010
~ This is a joint petition filed by the complainant Seema Kapoor, petitioner No. 1 and the accused persons namely petitioners No. 2 to 4 seeking quashing of FIR No. 69/1996 under Sections 406/498A P.S. Anand
Vihar registered on the complaint of the petitioner No. 1.
Petitioner No. 1 is present in person. She is identified by her counsel Sh. H.K.Shekher, Advocate and the Investigating Officer 51
C.L.Meena, P.S.Anand Vihar. Petitioner No. 2 is also present in person and
~e is identified by Sh. H.K.Shekher, Advocate for the petitioners.
Petitioner No. !/complainant submits that she is living separately along with her son Vaibhav Kapoor since 1994 and with the intervention of her son, she has decided to settle the matter with petitioners No. 2 to 4.
She states that matter has been amicably resolved and now, she does not wish to proceed against the other petitioners on her FIR. She further requests for quashing of the FIR No. 69/1996 P.S. Anand Vihar.
\
2010:DHC:9882
Learned APP submits that since the parties have resolved the r-y matter amicably, the State has no objection to the quashing of the FIR.
Parties have settled the matter and now there is no dispute left between them. Therefore, I feel that no useful purpose shall be served by keeping the FIR as well as proceedings arising out of the same alive.
Accordingly, keeping in view the nature of offence and in order to preserve harmonious relationship between the parties, FIR No. 69/1996 under Sections 406/498A P.S. Anand Vihar as well as proceedings arising
-out of the same are hereby quashed.
• Petition stands disposed of.
•
NOVEMBER 12, 2010 akb
(AJIT BHARIHOKE)
JUDGE
2010:DHC:9882
#31
12.11.2010
Present: Mr.H.K.Shekher, Advocate with Mr. Ranjeet Singh, Advocate for the petitioners with petitioner No. !/complainant & petitioner No. 2 in person.
Mr.R.N.Vats, APP for the respondent/State with 10 51
C.L.Meena, P.S. Anand Vihar.
+Cri.M.A.l7260/2010 (for exemption)
Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
Cri.M.C. 3525/2010
~ This is a joint petition filed by the complainant Seema Kapoor, petitioner No. 1 and the accused persons namely petitioners No. 2 to 4 seeking quashing of FIR No. 69/1996 under Sections 406/498A P.S. Anand
Vihar registered on the complaint of the petitioner No. 1.
Petitioner No. 1 is present in person. She is identified by her counsel Sh. H.K.Shekher, Advocate and the Investigating Officer 51
C.L.Meena, P.S.Anand Vihar. Petitioner No. 2 is also present in person and
~e is identified by Sh. H.K.Shekher, Advocate for the petitioners.
Petitioner No. !/complainant submits that she is living separately along with her son Vaibhav Kapoor since 1994 and with the intervention of her son, she has decided to settle the matter with petitioners No. 2 to 4.
She states that matter has been amicably resolved and now, she does not wish to proceed against the other petitioners on her FIR. She further requests for quashing of the FIR No. 69/1996 P.S. Anand Vihar.
\
2010:DHC:9882
Learned APP submits that since the parties have resolved the r-y matter amicably, the State has no objection to the quashing of the FIR.
Parties have settled the matter and now there is no dispute left between them. Therefore, I feel that no useful purpose shall be served by keeping the FIR as well as proceedings arising out of the same alive.
Accordingly, keeping in view the nature of offence and in order to preserve harmonious relationship between the parties, FIR No. 69/1996 under Sections 406/498A P.S. Anand Vihar as well as proceedings arising
-out of the same are hereby quashed.
• Petition stands disposed of.
•
NOVEMBER 12, 2010 akb
(AJIT BHARIHOKE)
JUDGE
2010:DHC:9882
JUDGMENT