Full Text
Translation output
$-29 HIGH COURT OF DELHI ·CRL.M.C. 3515/2010 SAMESHWAR SHARMA & ANR
Through: Mr. Vivek Kumar, Advocate
Through: Mr. Vivek Kumar, Advocate
VERSUS
..... Petitioner STATE & ANR ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Sunil Sharma, APP for State with Sl Rajesh Kumar
Through: Mr. Sunil Sharma, APP for State with Sl Rajesh Kumar
CORAM:
JUSTICE SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA
12.11.2010 This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C has been preferred by the petitioners for quashing of FIR No.26 of 2010 under Section 408 IPC registered with police station Vasant Kunj and the consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise arrive at between the parties.
The petitioner was given material for export by the complainant but instead of exporting the material in the name of complainant, the petitioner inflated the price of the material and showed someone else as exporter.
I consider that the intention of the petitioner was to cheat the government and take benefit of duty drawback from the government. The comP,romise with the complainant cannot be a ground for quashing an dismissed.
NOVEMBER 12, 2010 rd } 2010:DHC:9809
12.11.2010 This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C has been preferred by the petitioners for quashing of FIR No.26 of 2010 under Section 408 IPC registered with police station Vasant Kunj and the consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise arrive at between the parties.
The petitioner was given material for export by the complainant but instead of exporting the material in the name of complainant, the petitioner inflated the price of the material and showed someone else as exporter.
I consider that the intention of the petitioner was to cheat the government and take benefit of duty drawback from the government. The comP,romise with the complainant cannot be a ground for quashing an dismissed.
NOVEMBER 12, 2010 rd } 2010:DHC:9809
JUDGMENT