Full Text
Translation output
A-30
% 15.11.2010
Present: Mr. Rahul Gupta and Mr. Deepak Sahni, Advocates for Plaintiffs with Plaintiff No.2 in person.
Mr. Arun Aggarwal, Advocate for Defendants with
Defendant No. 1 - Renu Gupta in person.
+I.A. No. 15241/201Q (under Order 32 Ruie 6 & 7 CPC) in C.S. (OS) No. 1751/2007
*
Upon notice, Counsel for the Plaintiff has no objection to this application, which is accompanied by affidavit of Defendant No. 1.
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b) of this application, Defendant No. 1 is permitted to represent
Defendant No. 2 in these proceedings. j This l.A. stands disposed of.
+ C.S. (OS) No. 1751/2007. LA. No. 15240/2010 (under
Order 23 Rule 3 GPC)
This suit for partition stands settled between the parties through Delhi High Court Mediation & Conciliation
Centre and this is how this joint application under Order 23
Rule 3 CPC (Ex. C-1) has been filed by the parties to this suit, which is accompanied by affidavits of respective parties and this application also bears the signatures of Counsel for the parties. Counsel for the Plaintiff points out that this application
C.S.(OS]No.l751/2()07~ ^
2010:DHC:10102 j deserves to be allowed and the suit ought to be decreed in terms of para 4 of this application.
Upon perusal of the record, this Court finds no impediment in allowing this application. Consequentially, this application is allowed and suit is decreed in terms of para 4 of this application. Decree sheet be prepared forthwith.
This suit and the application are accordingly disposed of.
November 15, 2010 pkb
C.S. [OS] No. 1751/2007 il Gaur, J.
Page 2
2010:DHC:10102
% 15.11.2010
Present: Mr. Rahul Gupta and Mr. Deepak Sahni, Advocates for Plaintiffs with Plaintiff No.2 in person.
Mr. Arun Aggarwal, Advocate for Defendants with
Defendant No. 1 - Renu Gupta in person.
+I.A. No. 15241/201Q (under Order 32 Ruie 6 & 7 CPC) in C.S. (OS) No. 1751/2007
*
Upon notice, Counsel for the Plaintiff has no objection to this application, which is accompanied by affidavit of Defendant No. 1.
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b) of this application, Defendant No. 1 is permitted to represent
Defendant No. 2 in these proceedings. j This l.A. stands disposed of.
+ C.S. (OS) No. 1751/2007. LA. No. 15240/2010 (under
Order 23 Rule 3 GPC)
This suit for partition stands settled between the parties through Delhi High Court Mediation & Conciliation
Centre and this is how this joint application under Order 23
Rule 3 CPC (Ex. C-1) has been filed by the parties to this suit, which is accompanied by affidavits of respective parties and this application also bears the signatures of Counsel for the parties. Counsel for the Plaintiff points out that this application
C.S.(OS]No.l751/2()07~ ^
2010:DHC:10102 j deserves to be allowed and the suit ought to be decreed in terms of para 4 of this application.
Upon perusal of the record, this Court finds no impediment in allowing this application. Consequentially, this application is allowed and suit is decreed in terms of para 4 of this application. Decree sheet be prepared forthwith.
This suit and the application are accordingly disposed of.
November 15, 2010 pkb
C.S. [OS] No. 1751/2007 il Gaur, J.
Page 2
2010:DHC:10102
JUDGMENT