dbe950986e9998a278873ecaa29635bda827df7caa0d8fdd0718db4414a64650

Delhi High Court · 16 Nov 2010 · 2010:DHC:11546
Veena Birbal
RC. REV. 23/2010
2010:DHC:11546
civil petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The court disposed of the eviction challenge petition on the basis of a settlement granting the petitioner time to vacate the premises and restraining eviction execution temporarily.

Full Text
Translation output
-^i
-i
8.
* IN THE HIGH COURT
+ RC. REV. 23]-12010
NK PURI
OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI t :t
No. 1741e120I0
Through
VCTSUS
KULBHUSHAN SINDWANI
: Mr. rarun oil;;:ill:n"'
Through : M r. Akshuv vr. [r'.'[."t,f'?il o"n'
Mr. Vikas Bhadauria and
Ms. Amisha Gupta, Advs.
COMM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTTCE VEENA BIRBAL r.6.r.1.201_0
Counsel for parties have stated that the parties have settled the matter as the respondent has agreed to give time to the petitioner to vacate the premises by 30.11.2011.
Counsel for petitioner submits that in view of above settlement between the parties, petitioner is not pressing the present petition and petition be disposed of in terms of settlement stated above.
In view of above statement given by learned counsel for the parties, the present petition as well as pending application stand disposed of in terms of their settlement.
Petitioner is granted time to vacate the premises in question till 30.11.2011, subject to filing usual undertaking by
RC.REV. 231/2OLO
! o/o ti
2010:DHC:11546
\
//
the petitioner within two weeks from today.
Renotify on 01 .LZ.2OIO
Parties to also appear on the said date
In the meantime, respondent shall not execute the eviction order till the next date of hearing.
V*'2
VEENA BIRBAL, J
NOVEMBER 16, 2O].0 kks i
RC.REV. 23LI2OLO
2010:DHC:11546
JUDGMENT