Full Text
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C. 3461/2010 and CrLM.A. 17064/2010
SICOM LTD. Petitioner
Through: Mr. Jay Salva, Advocate with Mr.Sumit Ghosh and Mr. Rajpal Singh, Advs.
Through: Mr. Akshay Bipin, ASC for the State with SI K.K. Mishra, PS: Connaught Place.
Mr. Alok K. Aggarwal, Advocate for R5 to R8.
02.12.2010 1- The present petition is filed by the petitioner praying inter alia for directions to respondents No.2 to 4 to execute the non-bailable warrants issued by the learned CCJ (South), Patiala House Courts, New Delhi, in Criminal Complaint Case No.2525/2009, returnable on
29.11.2010 in accordance with law and to produce respondents No.5 to 8 before the concerned Court on the date fixed.
ORDER
2. A status report has been filed on behalf of respondents No.2 to 4 under an index dated 01.12.2010, with a copy to the counsel for the petitioner. Learned ASC draws the attention of this Court to Annexure P-2 at page 21 of the paper book, which is a compilation of 'CRL.M.C. 3461/2010 Page 1of 2 2010:DHC:14655 \ J I i I the complaints made by the petitioner against respondents No.5 to 8.;He states that the complaints mentioned at Sr. No.l, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 7 have been stayed by the concerned court. As far as the complaints mentioned at Sr. No.10 and 11 are concerned, it is stated that service has been effected on respondents No.5 to 8 by pasting the notice. In respect of the remaining cases mentioned at Sr. No.6, 8, 9 and 12 to 22, it is stated that as the process has not been received by Police Station: Connaught Place, the question of effecting service does not arise.
3. In view of the aforesaid stand of the learned ASC, the apprehension of the petitioner that the respondent/State is not taking any steps to effect service on respondents No.5 to 8 is assuaged. No further orders are required on this petition. The same is accordingly disposed of alongwith the pending application.
DECEMBER 02, 2010 rkb CRLM.C. 3461/2010 HIMA KOHLI,J