Full Text
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Reserve: 29th November, 2010
Date of Order: 2nd December, 2010 Crl. M.B. 1101 of 2010 in Crl. A. No. 930 of 2010
02.12.2010 DINESH ... Appellant
Through: Ms. Tanveer Ahmed Mir with Mr. Pratik Batta, Advocates
Through: Mr. Sunil Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Rajender Kaur
JUSTICE SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA
JUDGMENT
1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the reporter or not?
3. Whether judgment should be reported in Digest? ORAL
1. This application for suspension of sentence has been made by the applicant who has filed an appeal against his conviction under Section 376 IPC. The applicant was sentenced to 10 years R.I. for raping a minor girl of around six years of age.
2. The counsel for the applicant states that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case and the identification of the applicant by the prosecutrix and her mother did not inspired confidence.
3. I have gone through the testimony of witnesses. I consider that it is not a fit case for suspension of sentence at this stage. However, the appeal of the appellant be heard expeditiously and be listed for hearing on 7th February, 2011.
SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA J. DECEMBER 02, 2010 acm