Full Text
Translation output
% 03.12.2010
Present: Mr.Ashok Sapra, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr.Y.RSharma, Advocate for the respondents No.l &
2.
+C.M.21773/2010 U/O 2.^ R3 CPCl in R S.A.Nn.1 PR/^nn?
This is an application filed the parties for compromising the matter duly support by affidavits of appellant and respondents no.l
& 2. Terms and conditions of the compromise are contained therein. Parties are bound by the aforesaid terms.
R.S.A.No.198/2007
Counsel for the appellant states that parties have settled their dispute; son of the appellant has purchased the suit property from respondent no.l. He seeks permission of this court to withdraw the appeal.
Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
C.M.17561/2010 (u/0 32 R 11 CPC)
This application has been filed by the guardian who had been appointed by this court in terms of the order dated 15.3.2010 as guardian ad litem of minors Yogender and Baby Rinku. Learned counsel for the appellant has pointed out that after the said date, negotiations had taken place between the parties and the matter has now fructified into a settlement; no work has been carried out by the guardian. This position is not disputed. Ms.Vriti Nijhawan, 2010:DHC:15431
Guardian appointed by order dated 15.3.2010 is present in court.
She states that admittedly effective work had not been carried out as papers have not been furnished to her but she sent notices to the appellant in terms of the aforenoted order. It has been agreed that a sum of Rs. 10,000/- will be paid by the appellant within two days from today to the guardian in view of the short service rendered by her.
Application is disposed of.
INDERMEET KAUR, J.
DECEMBER 03, 2010
/
/
2010:DHC:15431
Present: Mr.Ashok Sapra, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr.Y.RSharma, Advocate for the respondents No.l &
2.
+C.M.21773/2010 U/O 2.^ R3 CPCl in R S.A.Nn.1 PR/^nn?
This is an application filed the parties for compromising the matter duly support by affidavits of appellant and respondents no.l
& 2. Terms and conditions of the compromise are contained therein. Parties are bound by the aforesaid terms.
R.S.A.No.198/2007
Counsel for the appellant states that parties have settled their dispute; son of the appellant has purchased the suit property from respondent no.l. He seeks permission of this court to withdraw the appeal.
Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
C.M.17561/2010 (u/0 32 R 11 CPC)
This application has been filed by the guardian who had been appointed by this court in terms of the order dated 15.3.2010 as guardian ad litem of minors Yogender and Baby Rinku. Learned counsel for the appellant has pointed out that after the said date, negotiations had taken place between the parties and the matter has now fructified into a settlement; no work has been carried out by the guardian. This position is not disputed. Ms.Vriti Nijhawan, 2010:DHC:15431
Guardian appointed by order dated 15.3.2010 is present in court.
She states that admittedly effective work had not been carried out as papers have not been furnished to her but she sent notices to the appellant in terms of the aforenoted order. It has been agreed that a sum of Rs. 10,000/- will be paid by the appellant within two days from today to the guardian in view of the short service rendered by her.
Application is disposed of.
INDERMEET KAUR, J.
DECEMBER 03, 2010
/
/
2010:DHC:15431
JUDGMENT