Full Text
Translation output
#
/o 08.12.2010
J
Present: Mr. Rajiv Bajaj, Adv. for the Petitioner with petitioner in person.
Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC for the State/R-1 with SI
Sanjay Kumar, P.S. Rajouri Garden.
Respondent No. 2 in person.
+ Crl.
M.A. No. 18282/2010 (exemption)
*
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
W.P. (Crl.) No. 1805/2010
Respondent No. 2 left his ATM card in the ATM machine due to inadvertence. This card was taken away by the petitioner and misused. He made shopping worth ~71,200/-.
FIR in question was registered on the complaint of respondent
No. 2. Now, petitioner and respondent No. 2 have settled the matter. Terms of settlement have been recorded in
Memorandum of Understanding dated 28th November, 2010.
Petitioner has returned ~71,200/- to respondent No.2. In view of compromise, respondent No. 2 is no more willing to pursue
2010:DHC:13453
1.-- this case any further. Petitioner is a young man of aged about
27 years.
Keeping in mind his future career prospects, in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, FIR No. 367/2010 under
Section 420 IPC registered at Police Station Rajouri Garden and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
Petitioner shall, however, deposit a sum of ~5,000 j- with the Delhi
High Court Legal Services Committee within one week.
Petition is disposed of in the above terms.
Copy of the order be given dasti to both the parties.
DECEMBER 08, 2010 rb
(1~
A.K. PATHAK, J.
2010:DHC:13453
J
Present: Mr. Rajiv Bajaj, Adv. for the Petitioner with petitioner in person.
Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC for the State/R-1 with SI
Sanjay Kumar, P.S. Rajouri Garden.
Respondent No. 2 in person.
+ Crl.
M.A. No. 18282/2010 (exemption)
*
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
W.P. (Crl.) No. 1805/2010
Respondent No. 2 left his ATM card in the ATM machine due to inadvertence. This card was taken away by the petitioner and misused. He made shopping worth ~71,200/-.
FIR in question was registered on the complaint of respondent
No. 2. Now, petitioner and respondent No. 2 have settled the matter. Terms of settlement have been recorded in
Memorandum of Understanding dated 28th November, 2010.
Petitioner has returned ~71,200/- to respondent No.2. In view of compromise, respondent No. 2 is no more willing to pursue
2010:DHC:13453
1.-- this case any further. Petitioner is a young man of aged about
27 years.
Keeping in mind his future career prospects, in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, FIR No. 367/2010 under
Section 420 IPC registered at Police Station Rajouri Garden and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
Petitioner shall, however, deposit a sum of ~5,000 j- with the Delhi
High Court Legal Services Committee within one week.
Petition is disposed of in the above terms.
Copy of the order be given dasti to both the parties.
DECEMBER 08, 2010 rb
(1~
A.K. PATHAK, J.
2010:DHC:13453
JUDGMENT