Full Text
Translation output
r r
# '
% 13.12.2010
Present: Mr. S.S. Gandhi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Abhishek Rai and Mr. Prashant Mishra, Advs. for the petitioners.
Mr. M.P. Singh, APP for the State-respondent no.l along with ASI Kalu Singh, P.S. Prashant Vihar.
Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Adv. for respondent no.2 along with respondent no.2 in person.
V + Crl. M.A. 18479/2010 fExemptionI
Allowed, subject to all ju§t exceptions.
Application stands dispose
+ Crl. M.C. 3863/2010
Petitioner no. 1 and respondent no. 2 are husband and wife. On account of temperamental differences they started living separately since 2004. On the complaint of respondent no.2, FIR in question was registered against petitioner no. 1 and his relatives i.e. petitioner nds.
2 to 4.
Now, petitioner nos. 1 and 2 have ironed out their differences with the intervention of common friends and family members. They have now started living together for the last more than one year.
Respondent no.2, who is present in person, confirms that she is living with petitioner no. 1 in matrimonial home happily and she has no objection if the FIR is quashed.
2010:DHC:9224 ft
1'
Siiice P^ies 'have ironed out their differences and living together in matomoniai home happily, no fruitful purpose would be served in keepingthe. criminal trial pending. Accordingly, in larger interest, FIR no. 368/2005 under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPG registered at Police Station' Prashant Vihar and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
Petition is disposed ofin the above terms.
Crl. M.A. 18478/2010 (Stay|
Disposed of as infructuous.
Dasti.
DECEMBER 13, 2010 ga o -
A.K. PATHAK, J.
2010:DHC:9224
% 13.12.2010
Present: Mr. S.S. Gandhi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Abhishek Rai and Mr. Prashant Mishra, Advs. for the petitioners.
Mr. M.P. Singh, APP for the State-respondent no.l along with ASI Kalu Singh, P.S. Prashant Vihar.
Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Adv. for respondent no.2 along with respondent no.2 in person.
V + Crl. M.A. 18479/2010 fExemptionI
Allowed, subject to all ju§t exceptions.
Application stands dispose
+ Crl. M.C. 3863/2010
Petitioner no. 1 and respondent no. 2 are husband and wife. On account of temperamental differences they started living separately since 2004. On the complaint of respondent no.2, FIR in question was registered against petitioner no. 1 and his relatives i.e. petitioner nds.
2 to 4.
Now, petitioner nos. 1 and 2 have ironed out their differences with the intervention of common friends and family members. They have now started living together for the last more than one year.
Respondent no.2, who is present in person, confirms that she is living with petitioner no. 1 in matrimonial home happily and she has no objection if the FIR is quashed.
2010:DHC:9224 ft
1'
Siiice P^ies 'have ironed out their differences and living together in matomoniai home happily, no fruitful purpose would be served in keepingthe. criminal trial pending. Accordingly, in larger interest, FIR no. 368/2005 under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPG registered at Police Station' Prashant Vihar and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
Petition is disposed ofin the above terms.
Crl. M.A. 18478/2010 (Stay|
Disposed of as infructuous.
Dasti.
DECEMBER 13, 2010 ga o -
A.K. PATHAK, J.
2010:DHC:9224
JUDGMENT