Full Text
Translation output
I j,- wt
2/-
('
.i'
'.'JJ
#19.
\
73.r2.2010
Present: Mr.Anil Goel, Advocate for the petitioners with petitioners in person..
Mr.R.N.Vats, APP for the respondent/State with Sl Subhash
Bhatt, P.S. Farsh Bazar.
Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate for the respondent No. 2 with respondent No. 2 in person with his father.
+Crl.M.C.359O/2O1O & Crl.M.A. L7493/2O1O (stav)
This is a petition seeking quashing of FIR No.7412004 under Section
45213231341 & 506 read with Section 34 IPC registered at P.S. Farsh
Bazar, Delhi on the complaint of respondent No. 2.
Ground for seeking quashing is that the parties are related to each other and the FIR is the result of misunderstanding due to family dispute and that the parties have amicably settled the matter in interest of amicable and harmonious family relations.
Petitioners are present in person. They are identified by their counsel Sh. Anil Goel, Advocate.
Respondent No. 2 is also present. He is identified by his counsel Sh.
Manish Kumar, Advocate.
Petitioners as well as respondent No. 2 submit that they are related to each other and they have amicably settled the matter. In terms of the settlement, property No. 3175, Gali Memwali, Chota Bazar, Shahdara, Delhi has been sold and its sale proceeds are equally divided between
Ashok Kumar Bansal (petitioner No. 7) and father of the respondent No. 2 to which settlement, neither of the parties have any objection. lt is also
(' v
2010:DHC:9213
)
\-
, I r-
Y
I t to which settlement, neither of the parties have any objection. lt is also submitted that now, there is no dispute left between the parties.
Respondent No. 2 confirms that he has entered into the settlement with the petitioners without any undue pressure or coercion or threat and now, there is no dispute left him and the petitioners. Respondent No. 2 submits that the terms of settlement between Vinod Kumar Bansal, Shikha
Bansal, Madhu Bansal, Rahul Bansal on the one hand and Sh. Ashok
Bansal, Sachin Bansal, Rita Bansal and Veena Bansal on the other hand are recorded in the copy of deed of settlement placed on record as
Annexure P3. He further states that today also, a settlement deed has been executed between the parties, which is now placed on record and it bears his signatures as well as signatures of all the petitioners. The petitioners also admit their signatures on the settlement deed filed today and they request for quashing of the FlR. Thus, in the interest of justice of amicable family relations, he does not want any action against the petitioners on his FIR No. 7412004, P.S.Farsh Bazar and he has no objection if the FIR as well as the proceedings arising out of the same are quashed.
Learned APP submits that taking into account that the FIR is the result of family dispute and parties have amicably settled the matter, State has no objection if the FIR No. 7412004, P.S.Farsh Bazar and the proceedings arising out the same are quashed in the interest of amicable and harmonious family relations between the parties.
(
,-l r'I
/
Since the parties have settled the matter in dispute amicably and the FIR is the result of family misunderstanding, I find that no useful purpose will be served in keeping the matter alive. Accordingly FIR NO. 7412004 registered at P.S. Farsh Bazar Delhi and the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
The petition and criminal miscellaneous appljcation are disposed of.
Order be given Dasti under the signature of Court Master.
(AJrT BHARTHOKE)
,UDGE
DECEMBER 13, 2O1O akb
V
2/-
('
.i'
'.'JJ
#19.
\
73.r2.2010
Present: Mr.Anil Goel, Advocate for the petitioners with petitioners in person..
Mr.R.N.Vats, APP for the respondent/State with Sl Subhash
Bhatt, P.S. Farsh Bazar.
Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate for the respondent No. 2 with respondent No. 2 in person with his father.
+Crl.M.C.359O/2O1O & Crl.M.A. L7493/2O1O (stav)
This is a petition seeking quashing of FIR No.7412004 under Section
45213231341 & 506 read with Section 34 IPC registered at P.S. Farsh
Bazar, Delhi on the complaint of respondent No. 2.
Ground for seeking quashing is that the parties are related to each other and the FIR is the result of misunderstanding due to family dispute and that the parties have amicably settled the matter in interest of amicable and harmonious family relations.
Petitioners are present in person. They are identified by their counsel Sh. Anil Goel, Advocate.
Respondent No. 2 is also present. He is identified by his counsel Sh.
Manish Kumar, Advocate.
Petitioners as well as respondent No. 2 submit that they are related to each other and they have amicably settled the matter. In terms of the settlement, property No. 3175, Gali Memwali, Chota Bazar, Shahdara, Delhi has been sold and its sale proceeds are equally divided between
Ashok Kumar Bansal (petitioner No. 7) and father of the respondent No. 2 to which settlement, neither of the parties have any objection. lt is also
(' v
2010:DHC:9213
)
\-
, I r-
Y
I t to which settlement, neither of the parties have any objection. lt is also submitted that now, there is no dispute left between the parties.
Respondent No. 2 confirms that he has entered into the settlement with the petitioners without any undue pressure or coercion or threat and now, there is no dispute left him and the petitioners. Respondent No. 2 submits that the terms of settlement between Vinod Kumar Bansal, Shikha
Bansal, Madhu Bansal, Rahul Bansal on the one hand and Sh. Ashok
Bansal, Sachin Bansal, Rita Bansal and Veena Bansal on the other hand are recorded in the copy of deed of settlement placed on record as
Annexure P3. He further states that today also, a settlement deed has been executed between the parties, which is now placed on record and it bears his signatures as well as signatures of all the petitioners. The petitioners also admit their signatures on the settlement deed filed today and they request for quashing of the FlR. Thus, in the interest of justice of amicable family relations, he does not want any action against the petitioners on his FIR No. 7412004, P.S.Farsh Bazar and he has no objection if the FIR as well as the proceedings arising out of the same are quashed.
Learned APP submits that taking into account that the FIR is the result of family dispute and parties have amicably settled the matter, State has no objection if the FIR No. 7412004, P.S.Farsh Bazar and the proceedings arising out the same are quashed in the interest of amicable and harmonious family relations between the parties.
(
,-l r'I
/
Since the parties have settled the matter in dispute amicably and the FIR is the result of family misunderstanding, I find that no useful purpose will be served in keeping the matter alive. Accordingly FIR NO. 7412004 registered at P.S. Farsh Bazar Delhi and the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
The petition and criminal miscellaneous appljcation are disposed of.
Order be given Dasti under the signature of Court Master.
(AJrT BHARTHOKE)
,UDGE
DECEMBER 13, 2O1O akb
V
JUDGMENT