Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI cRL.M.C. 3855/2010 KAPIL NARANG & ORS ..... Petitioner
Through: Ms. Princy Ponnan, Advocate VCTSUS NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Sunil Sharma, APP for the State Mr. Sunil Kumar, Sl, PS Uttam Nagar
Mr. Ritesh Bahri, Mr. Ajay Kumar Bansal, Advocates for Ms. Pooja R-2 along with Ms. pooja a GORAM:
JUSTICE SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA
13.12.2010 This petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing of
FIR No. 33712003 under Section 4il8N4OO read with Section 34 lpc pS Uttam
Nagar on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. In terms of the compromise, balance amount of Rs.2,12,0001- has been handed over to the complainant by way of a bank draft/PO. The complainant is present along w1h her Counsel and states that in view of settlement, she does not want to pursue
' this FIR further. ln view of compromise arrived at, the petition is allowed. FIR
No. 337/2003 PS Uttam Nagar and proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed. The comptainant is identified by the tO. I
I
SHIV NAAMKINGRA,J DECEMBER 13, 2010 -/ vn $-44
-Crr* U,/alrt ,"8)uu r/s. Us> u|r .
2010:DHC:9208 ( r. t $-27 HIGH COURT OF DELHI cRL.M.C.3855/2010
KAPIL NARANG & ORS ..... Petitioner
Through: Ms. Princy Ponnan, Advocate VCTSUS NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. O.P. Saxena, APP for State
Through: Ms. Princy Ponnan, Advocate VCTSUS NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Sunil Sharma, APP for the State Mr. Sunil Kumar, Sl, PS Uttam Nagar
Mr. Ritesh Bahri, Mr. Ajay Kumar Bansal, Advocates for Ms. Pooja R-2 along with Ms. pooja a GORAM:
JUSTICE SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA
13.12.2010 This petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing of
FIR No. 33712003 under Section 4il8N4OO read with Section 34 lpc pS Uttam
Nagar on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. In terms of the compromise, balance amount of Rs.2,12,0001- has been handed over to the complainant by way of a bank draft/PO. The complainant is present along w1h her Counsel and states that in view of settlement, she does not want to pursue
' this FIR further. ln view of compromise arrived at, the petition is allowed. FIR
No. 337/2003 PS Uttam Nagar and proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed. The comptainant is identified by the tO. I
I
SHIV NAAMKINGRA,J DECEMBER 13, 2010 -/ vn $-44
-Crr* U,/alrt ,"8)uu r/s. Us> u|r .
2010:DHC:9208 ( r. t $-27 HIGH COURT OF DELHI cRL.M.C.3855/2010
KAPIL NARANG & ORS ..... Petitioner
Through: Ms. Princy Ponnan, Advocate VCTSUS NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. O.P. Saxena, APP for State
CORAM:
JUSTICE SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA
07.01.2011 Crl.MA 108/2011 This application has been made for correction of an error in order dated 13rh
December 2010 whereby this Court quashed the FIR No.337 of 2003. lt is stated by the counsel for the applicant that the correct FIR number was 914 of 2007.
A perusal of petition would show that the petitioners made this clerical error in the title of the petitiongo itself while in the body of the petition, the petitioners have mentioned FIR No.914 of 2OO7.The error &rnorder dated 13th December
2 2010 is on account of incorrect statement made in the title of the petition by the petitioners. However, for the reasons given therein, the application is allowed and the order dated 13th December 2010 is modified to the extent that the FIR number be read as 914 o'f 2007 instead of 337 of 2003.
With above order, the application stands disposed of.
SHIV NARA
JANUARY 07,2011 rd ,ho,,*o^o,, 2010:DHC:9208
07.01.2011 Crl.MA 108/2011 This application has been made for correction of an error in order dated 13rh
December 2010 whereby this Court quashed the FIR No.337 of 2003. lt is stated by the counsel for the applicant that the correct FIR number was 914 of 2007.
A perusal of petition would show that the petitioners made this clerical error in the title of the petitiongo itself while in the body of the petition, the petitioners have mentioned FIR No.914 of 2OO7.The error &rnorder dated 13th December
2 2010 is on account of incorrect statement made in the title of the petition by the petitioners. However, for the reasons given therein, the application is allowed and the order dated 13th December 2010 is modified to the extent that the FIR number be read as 914 o'f 2007 instead of 337 of 2003.
With above order, the application stands disposed of.
SHIV NARA
JANUARY 07,2011 rd ,ho,,*o^o,, 2010:DHC:9208
JUDGMENT