Full Text
Translation output
#
% 13.12.2010
Present: Ms. Suman Chauha:q, Adv. for the Petitioners.
Mr. M.P. Singh, APP for the State along with ASI Sat
Mohan, P.S. Prasad 'Nagar.
Mr. Jivesh Tiwari, Adv. for respondent no.2 along with respondent no.2 in person.
+ Crl. M.c~ 3852/2010
*
Petitioners and respondent no.2 are neighbors. On the complaint of respondent no.2, FIR in question was registered against the petitioners. It was alleged in the FIR that petitioners had forcibly snatched mobile phone. Now, petitioners and respondent no.2 have resolved their dispute amicably, inasmuch as, they want to maintain harmonious relations with each other in future being the neighbors.
Terms of settlement have been incorporated in the Settlement Deed dated 2nct August, 2010 (Annexure B at page nos. 12 to 14).
Respondent no.2, who is present in court, states that he has no objection if the FIR is quashed.
Since both the parties have resolved their dispute->amicably, no fruitful purpose would be served in compelling the parties to continue to litigate a protracted trial. Accordingly, in larger interest, FIR NO. 87/2010 under Sections 356/379/411 registered at Police Station
2010:DHC:9205
Prasad Nagar and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
Petition is disposed of in the above terms.
Dasti.
DECEMBER 13, 2010 ga
~
A.K. PATHAK, J.
2010:DHC:9205
% 13.12.2010
Present: Ms. Suman Chauha:q, Adv. for the Petitioners.
Mr. M.P. Singh, APP for the State along with ASI Sat
Mohan, P.S. Prasad 'Nagar.
Mr. Jivesh Tiwari, Adv. for respondent no.2 along with respondent no.2 in person.
+ Crl. M.c~ 3852/2010
*
Petitioners and respondent no.2 are neighbors. On the complaint of respondent no.2, FIR in question was registered against the petitioners. It was alleged in the FIR that petitioners had forcibly snatched mobile phone. Now, petitioners and respondent no.2 have resolved their dispute amicably, inasmuch as, they want to maintain harmonious relations with each other in future being the neighbors.
Terms of settlement have been incorporated in the Settlement Deed dated 2nct August, 2010 (Annexure B at page nos. 12 to 14).
Respondent no.2, who is present in court, states that he has no objection if the FIR is quashed.
Since both the parties have resolved their dispute->amicably, no fruitful purpose would be served in compelling the parties to continue to litigate a protracted trial. Accordingly, in larger interest, FIR NO. 87/2010 under Sections 356/379/411 registered at Police Station
2010:DHC:9205
Prasad Nagar and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
Petition is disposed of in the above terms.
Dasti.
DECEMBER 13, 2010 ga
~
A.K. PATHAK, J.
2010:DHC:9205
JUDGMENT