Full Text
Translation output
-
I
I
#
% 10.12.2010
Present: Mr. D.K. Santoshi, Adv. for the petitioner.
Mr. M.P. Singh, APP for the State-respondent no.1 along with Insp. Raj Kumar, Special Cell (West).
Mr. R.K. Gupta, Adv. for respondent no. 2 along with respondent no. 2 in person.
+ Crl. M.A. 18388/2010
*
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
+ Crl. M.C. 3831/2010
Petitioner and respondent no. 2 are neighbors. On the complaint of respondent no. 2, FIR in question was registered against the petitioner. It is alleged in the FIR that while respondent no. 2 was returning home, petitioner misbehaved with her.
Petitioner took her in a room and expressed his immense love for her. Petitioner proposed respondent no.2 to marry him and when she declined his proposal, he gave beatings to her. He also threatened her. He also locked her up in a room and went away.
After some time he again returned and opened the door. He threatened her that he would consume poison and involve her in the criminal case.
2010:DHC:9178
Now, with the intervention of their family members and common friends, petitioner and respondent no.2 have settled the disputes amicably, inasmuch as, they want to maintain harmonious relations with each other in future being the neighbors. Respondent no.2, who is present in Court, states that she has no objection if FIR is quashed.
In view of above facts of the case, FIR No.420I2007 under
Sections 354I342I 506I 323 IPC registered at Police Station
Trilokpuri and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
Petition is disposed of in the above terms.
Dasti.
DECEMBER 10, 2010 ga
~~
A.K. PATHAK, J.
2010:DHC:9178
% 10.12.2010
Present: Mr. D.K. Santoshi, Adv. for the petitioner.
Mr. M.P. Singh, APP for the State-respondent no.1 along with Insp. Raj Kumar, Special Cell (West).
Mr. R.K. Gupta, Adv. for respondent no. 2 along with respondent no. 2 in person.
+ Crl. M.A. 18388/2010
*
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
+ Crl. M.C. 3831/2010
Petitioner and respondent no. 2 are neighbors. On the complaint of respondent no. 2, FIR in question was registered against the petitioner. It is alleged in the FIR that while respondent no. 2 was returning home, petitioner misbehaved with her.
Petitioner took her in a room and expressed his immense love for her. Petitioner proposed respondent no.2 to marry him and when she declined his proposal, he gave beatings to her. He also threatened her. He also locked her up in a room and went away.
After some time he again returned and opened the door. He threatened her that he would consume poison and involve her in the criminal case.
2010:DHC:9178
Now, with the intervention of their family members and common friends, petitioner and respondent no.2 have settled the disputes amicably, inasmuch as, they want to maintain harmonious relations with each other in future being the neighbors. Respondent no.2, who is present in Court, states that she has no objection if FIR is quashed.
In view of above facts of the case, FIR No.420I2007 under
Sections 354I342I 506I 323 IPC registered at Police Station
Trilokpuri and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
Petition is disposed of in the above terms.
Dasti.
DECEMBER 10, 2010 ga
~~
A.K. PATHAK, J.
2010:DHC:9178
JUDGMENT