Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) No. 6822/2010 & CMs 13493-13494/2010
Date of Decision: 25.01.2011 UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ..... Petitioner
Through : Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Advocate
W.P.(C) No. 6822/2010 & CMs 13493-13494/2010
Date of Decision: 25.01.2011 UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ..... Petitioner
Through : Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Advocate
VERSUS
RAM NATH & ORS .... Respondent
Through : Mr. T.D. Yadav, Advocate for respondent no.1.
Mr. Amit Chadha, Advocate for respondent no.2 & 3.
Through : Mr. T.D. Yadav, Advocate for respondent no.1.
Mr. Amit Chadha, Advocate for respondent no.2 & 3.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL
JUDGMENT
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? Yes
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? No
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in Digest? No ANIL KUMAR, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions seeks to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file the review petition before the Tribunal along with the documents filed on behalf of petitioner in the writ petition which could not be filed before the Tribunal earlier. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. All the pending applications are also disposed of. ANIL KUMAR, J. VEENA BIRBAL, J. JANUARY 25, 2011