Full Text
Translation output
% 18.01.2011
Present: Mr. Vikas Yadav, Adv. for the petitioner.
Respondent no. 1 in person.
Mr. M.P. Singh, APP for the State-respondent no.2 along with
SI Anil Kumar, P.S. Model Town.
+ Cr!. M.C. 79/2011
*
Petitioner no. 1 and respondent no. 1 were married as per Hindu rites and ceremonies sometime in the year 2004. On account of
16 temperamental differences they started living separately since 2005. On the complaint of respondent no. 1, FIR in question was registered against petitioner no. 1 and his relatives i.e. petitioner nos. 2 to 4. With the intervention of common friends and family members petitioner no. 1 and respondent no. 2 have settled the matter sometime in the year 2008.
Pursuant to the settlement, petitioner no. 1 and respondent no. 1 have even obtained decree of divorce by way of mutual consent from the court of Additional District Judge, Delhi on 17th March, 2008. Thereafter, 49 respondent no. 1 has even re-married. Respondent no. 1, who is present in the Court, has no objection if the present FIR is quashed.
Keeping in mind the above facts, in the larger interest, FIR NO. 47/2006 under Sections 406/498A/34 IPC registered at Police Station
Model Town and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
2011:DHC:8763
Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Dasti.
1CPATHAK, J.
JANUARY 18, 2011 ga
Present: Mr. Vikas Yadav, Adv. for the petitioner.
Respondent no. 1 in person.
Mr. M.P. Singh, APP for the State-respondent no.2 along with
SI Anil Kumar, P.S. Model Town.
+ Cr!. M.C. 79/2011
*
Petitioner no. 1 and respondent no. 1 were married as per Hindu rites and ceremonies sometime in the year 2004. On account of
16 temperamental differences they started living separately since 2005. On the complaint of respondent no. 1, FIR in question was registered against petitioner no. 1 and his relatives i.e. petitioner nos. 2 to 4. With the intervention of common friends and family members petitioner no. 1 and respondent no. 2 have settled the matter sometime in the year 2008.
Pursuant to the settlement, petitioner no. 1 and respondent no. 1 have even obtained decree of divorce by way of mutual consent from the court of Additional District Judge, Delhi on 17th March, 2008. Thereafter, 49 respondent no. 1 has even re-married. Respondent no. 1, who is present in the Court, has no objection if the present FIR is quashed.
Keeping in mind the above facts, in the larger interest, FIR NO. 47/2006 under Sections 406/498A/34 IPC registered at Police Station
Model Town and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
2011:DHC:8763
Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Dasti.
1CPATHAK, J.
JANUARY 18, 2011 ga
2011:DHC:8763
JUDGMENT