Full Text
Translation output
G'
$-9, $-10, $-11 and $-15 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C. 1964/2010
SOUMIT RANJAN JENA & ORS. ..... Petitioner
Through None
$-9, $-10, $-11 and $-15 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C. 1964/2010
SOUMIT RANJAN JENA & ORS. ..... Petitioner
Through None
VERSUS
STATE & ANR.
CRL.M.C. 1965/2010 ..... Respondent
Through Mr. Sunil Sharma, Addi. PP Inspector Arun Kr. Choudhary, Anti Forgery
Section, EOW
Through Mr. Sunil Sharma, Addi. PP Inspector Arun Kr. Choudhary, Anti Forgery
Section, EOW
VERSUS
CRL.M.C. 1966/2010
Section, EOW
Section, EOW
VERSUS
CRL.M.C. 2631/2010
Ms Afsana Parveen, Adv. for UOI SOUMIT RANJAN JENA ..... Petitioner
Ms Afsana Parveen, Adv. for UOI SOUMIT RANJAN JENA ..... Petitioner
VERSUS
STATE &ANR ..... Respondent 2011:DHC:8701
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA
18.01.2011 / )
No one appears for the petitioner. A perusal of record would show that petitioner's counsel did not appear on very first hearing of the matter after filing of the petition for quashing of FIR. Thereafter today again an adjournment slip has been circulated and the state counsel has been told that counsel for the petitioner is in personal difficulty today without specifying the nature of personal difficulty.
The petition is hereby dismissed.
JANUARY 18, 2011 acm 2011:DHC:8701
18.01.2011 / )
No one appears for the petitioner. A perusal of record would show that petitioner's counsel did not appear on very first hearing of the matter after filing of the petition for quashing of FIR. Thereafter today again an adjournment slip has been circulated and the state counsel has been told that counsel for the petitioner is in personal difficulty today without specifying the nature of personal difficulty.
The petition is hereby dismissed.
JANUARY 18, 2011 acm 2011:DHC:8701
JUDGMENT