Soumit Ranjan Jena v. State

Delhi High Court · 18 Jan 2011 · 2011:DHC:8693
Shiv Narayan Dhingra
CRL.M.C. 1964/2010
2011:DHC:8693
criminal petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for quashing of FIR due to non-appearance of the petitioners' counsel without valid reason.

Full Text
Translation output
L
$-9, $-10, $-11 and $-15 t HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C. 1964/2010
SOUMIT RANJAN JENA & ORS. ..... petitioner
Through None VETSUS STATE & ANR. ..... Respondent
Through Mr. Sunil Sharma, Addl. PP Inspector Arun Kr. Choudhary, Anti Forgery
Section, EOW
GRL.M.C. 1965/2010
VETSUS
Through Mr. Sunil Sharma, Addl. pp Section, EOW
GRL.M.C. 1966/2010
VETSUS
Ms Afsana Parveen, Adv. for UOI
CRL.M.C. 2631/2010
SOUMIT RANJAN JENA ..... petitioner
VERSUS
STATE & ANR ..... Respondent 2011:DHC:8693 { -v
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA
18.01 .2011 No one appears for the petitioner. A perusal of record would show that petitioner's counsel did not appear on very first hearing of the matter after filing of the petition for quashing of FlR. Thereafter today again an adjournment slip has been circulated and the state counsel has been told that counsel for the petitioner is in personal difficulty today without specifying the nature of personal difficulty.
The petition is hereby dismissed.
JANUARY 18,2011 acm SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA,J.< 2011:DHC:8693
JUDGMENT