Full Text
Translation output
It 3# HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C. 2356/2010
VINAY KUMAR & ORS . Petitioners
Through: Mr. Rajmangal Kumar, Advocate for Ms. Rakhi Dubey, Advocate along with the petitioners in person.
CRL.M.C. 2356/2010
VINAY KUMAR & ORS . Petitioners
Through: Mr. Rajmangal Kumar, Advocate for Ms. Rakhi Dubey, Advocate along with the petitioners in person.
VERSUS
STATE & ANR Respondents
Through: Mr. Manoj Ohri, APPwith SI Giriraj Singh, PS Badarpur, Delhi.
Respondent No. 2 in person.
Through: Mr. Manoj Ohri, APPwith SI Giriraj Singh, PS Badarpur, Delhi.
Respondent No. 2 in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
18.01.2011 This is a petition under Section 482 Gr.P.G. for quashing of FIR NO. 52/2008 under Sections 498A/406//34 IPG registered at PS Badarpur, Delhi.
The parties, that is, the Petitioners and the Respondent No. 2/complainant have amicably resolved their differences with the intervention of the common relatives and mediation. They are happily living together.
Respondent No. 2/complainant Smt. Archana, who is present in person, is identified by learned counsel for the Petitioners and also by SI
Giriraj Singh. She states that since August, 2010 she is living with her
18.01.2011 This is a petition under Section 482 Gr.P.G. for quashing of FIR NO. 52/2008 under Sections 498A/406//34 IPG registered at PS Badarpur, Delhi.
The parties, that is, the Petitioners and the Respondent No. 2/complainant have amicably resolved their differences with the intervention of the common relatives and mediation. They are happily living together.
Respondent No. 2/complainant Smt. Archana, who is present in person, is identified by learned counsel for the Petitioners and also by SI
Giriraj Singh. She states that since August, 2010 she is living with her
CRL.M.C. 2356/2010
2011:DHC:8682 husband in the matrimonial home and does not want to pursue the present
FIR.
Since the pendency of the present FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto would create further acrimony and disharmony between the parties, it wouldbe in the interest ofjustice that the prayer in the petition is allowed.
Consequently FIR No. 52/2008 under Sections 498A/406//34 IPC registered at PS Badarpur, Delhi and the proceedings pursuant thereto are quashed.
Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements before this Court.
JANUARY 18, 2011 vn Cf^&tilxane^ 0 .. , -0, CRL.M.C. 2356/2010
MUKTA GUPTA, J. lie.
Page 2 of2 2011:DHC:8682
2011:DHC:8682 husband in the matrimonial home and does not want to pursue the present
FIR.
Since the pendency of the present FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto would create further acrimony and disharmony between the parties, it wouldbe in the interest ofjustice that the prayer in the petition is allowed.
Consequently FIR No. 52/2008 under Sections 498A/406//34 IPC registered at PS Badarpur, Delhi and the proceedings pursuant thereto are quashed.
Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements before this Court.
JANUARY 18, 2011 vn Cf^&tilxane^ 0 .. , -0, CRL.M.C. 2356/2010
MUKTA GUPTA, J. lie.
Page 2 of2 2011:DHC:8682
JUDGMENT