Soumit Ranjan Jena v. State

Delhi High Court · 18 Jan 2011 · 2011:DHC:8675
Shiv Narayan Dhingra
CRL.M.C. 1964/2010
2011:DHC:8675
criminal petition_dismissed Procedural

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking quashing of FIR due to non-appearance of petitioners' counsel and failure to prosecute.

Full Text
Translation output
$-9, $-10: $-11 and$-15 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.IVI.C. 1964/2010
SOUMIT RANJAN JENA &ORS. Petitionsr
Through None
VERSUS
STATE &ANR. Respondent
Through Mr. Sunil Sharma, Addl. PP Inspector Arun Kr. Choudhary, Anti Forgery
Section, EOW
CRL.M.C. 1965/2010
SGUIVIIT RANJAN JENA &ORS. Petitioner
VERSUS
^TAT^&ANR. Respondent Section, EOW
CRL.M.C. 1966/2010
SOUMIT RANJAN JENA &ORS. Petitioner
VERSUS
state &ANR. Respondent Ms Afsana Parveen, Adv. for UOI
CRL.M.C. 2631/2010
SOUMIT RANJAN JENA Petitioner
VERSUS
states ANR Respondent 2011:DHC:8675
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA
18.01.2011 No one appears for the petitioner. A perusal of record would show that petitioner's counsel did notappear on very first hearing ofthe matter afterfiling ofthe petition for quashing of FIR. Thereafter today again an adjournment slip has been circulated and the state counsel has been told that counsel for the petitioner is in personal difficulty today without specifying the nature of personal difficulty.
The petition is hereby dismissed.
SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA,J JANUARY 18, 2011 acm 2011:DHC:8675
JUDGMENT