Atul Mishra & Ors v. State & Anr

Delhi High Court · 18 Jan 2011 · 2011:DHC:8669
Shiv Narayan Dhingra
CRLM.C. 3100/2010
2011:DHC:8669
criminal petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a bona fide compromise between the parties and the complainant's consent to withdraw prosecution.

Full Text
Translation output
$-16 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRLM.C. 3100/2010
ATUL MISHRA & ORS Petitioner
Through Mr. Anshuman Sinha, Adv.
VERSUS
STATE &ANR Respondent
Through Mr. Sunil Sharma, Addl. PP with AS! Subhash Chand, P.S. Janakpuri
Mr. Pradeep Sharma, Adv. for complainant
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA
18.01.2011 This petition has been filed for quashing of FIR No. 393 of 2002, lodged under Section 498-A/406/34 IPG, P.S. Janakpuri East on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.
Notice of this petition was served upon the complainant. She has appeared and states that the matter between the parties stands settled. She does not wish to proceed with the FIR got registered by her. Complainant is identified by Mr. Pradeep Sharma, Advocate, counsel for the complainant.
In view of this submission of the complainant, the petition is allowed and
FIR No. 393 of 2002, lodged under Section 498-A/406/34 IPG, P.S. Janakpuri
East and all proceedings arising there from are hereby q^uashed.
SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA,J JANUARY 18, 2011 acm 2011:DHC:8669
JUDGMENT