Full Text
Translation output
2r &22 o/o 28.OI.2OtI
Present: Ms. Amrita Bhattacharya, Adv. for the petitioner.
Mr. M.P. Singh, APP for the State/respondent No.1.
Mr. Pramod Kr. Dubey with Mr. Kunal Sood and
Mr. Satpal, Advocates for the respondent No.2.
+ Crl.M.C. 1690/20O7 & Crl.M.A.No.5868/2OO7
. + Crl.M.C.1691/2OO7 &CrI.M.A.No.587O/2OO7
/t'' t
Both the petitions stand disposed of. Pending applications
,._.1\ stand disposed of accordingly, Interim orders stand. vacated.
Dasti.
N lb^'r-4
A.K. PATHAK, J.
JANUARY 28,2OL1 vk
In terms of the settlement arrived at between the petitioner and the complainant (respondent No.2), apologr has been published in the newspaper dated 26e January, 2OlI. Respondent No.2 has no objection in case the complaint case is quashed.
In view of the setflement arrived at between the parties, Complaint Case Nos.83/2006 and 7212006 are quashed.
2011:DHC:11897
Present: Ms. Amrita Bhattacharya, Adv. for the petitioner.
Mr. M.P. Singh, APP for the State/respondent No.1.
Mr. Pramod Kr. Dubey with Mr. Kunal Sood and
Mr. Satpal, Advocates for the respondent No.2.
+ Crl.M.C. 1690/20O7 & Crl.M.A.No.5868/2OO7
. + Crl.M.C.1691/2OO7 &CrI.M.A.No.587O/2OO7
/t'' t
Both the petitions stand disposed of. Pending applications
,._.1\ stand disposed of accordingly, Interim orders stand. vacated.
Dasti.
N lb^'r-4
A.K. PATHAK, J.
JANUARY 28,2OL1 vk
In terms of the settlement arrived at between the petitioner and the complainant (respondent No.2), apologr has been published in the newspaper dated 26e January, 2OlI. Respondent No.2 has no objection in case the complaint case is quashed.
In view of the setflement arrived at between the parties, Complaint Case Nos.83/2006 and 7212006 are quashed.
2011:DHC:11897
JUDGMENT