Sushila Singh v. Dilip Singh

Delhi High Court · 22 Aug 2024 · 2024:DHC:6403
Manoj Jain
CM(M) 3199/2024
2024:DHC:6403
civil other Procedural

AI Summary

The High Court directed the Trial Court to decide the pending application to set aside the order closing the petitioner's right to file reply in probate proceedings before entertaining further challenge.

Full Text
Translation output
CM(M) 3199/2024 1
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 22nd August, 2024
CM(M) 3199/2024 & CM APPL. 47989-47991/2024
SUSHILA SINGH .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Murai Tiwari
WITH
Mr. Tripuran Tiwari, Mr. Krishnam Swami and
Ms. Nimisha Gupta, Advocates.
VERSUS
DILIP SINGH .....Respondent
Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
JUDGMENT
(oral)

1. Petitioner is respondent No. 7 before the learned Trial Court and is defending a petition seeking probate.

2. She is aggrieved by order dated 13.03.2024 whereby her right to file reply/objection has been closed.

3. It is, however, noticed that respondent Nos. 7 to 10 have already moved one application before the learned Trial Court seeking to set aside/recall the above said order dated 13.03.2024 and such application is pending consideration before the learned Trial Court on 27th instant.

4. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with the request to the learned Trial Court to consider the above said application on the date fixed and to dispose that of after hearing both the sides and in accordance CM(M) 3199/2024 2 with law.

5. Needless to say, if petitioner herein still feels aggrieved and the above said order is not recalled or set aside, she would be at liberty to move petition afresh before this Court for redressal of her grievances.

6. Petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

JUDGE AUGUST 22, 2024