Full Text
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 28th August, 2024
DHIRENDER NATH PURI .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Manohar Malik, Mr. Prateek Chauhan and Ms. Astha Gumber, Advocates.
Through: None.
JUDGMENT
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
1. The petitioner is plaintiff before the learned Civil Judge and has filed a suit for mandatory injunction.
2. The petitioner had also prayed for ex-parte ad-interim injunction and such request was declined by the learned Civil Judge vide order dated 9th August, 2024. Feeling aggrieved, the plaintiff filed an appeal before the concerned Court of learned District Judge and his such appeal was also dismissed on 22nd August, 2024.
3. During course of the arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that earlier he had prayed for ad-interim ex-parte injunction but his CM(M) 3246/2024 2 substantive application moved under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 CPC is pending adjudication before the learned Trial Court and is now fixed for 29th instant.
4. He, therefore, prays that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition but simultaneously, a direction be issued to the learned Trial Court to hear the above said application and to decide such application as expeditiously as possible, without getting influenced with the observations made in the impugned order(s).
5. In view of the above, the present is petition hereby dismissed as not pressed.
6. Liberty, as prayed, is granted and it is expected that the learned Trial Court would consider the above said application in a dispassionate manner, without getting influenced by any of the observations appearing in the impugned order(s).
7. It is also clarified that this Court has also not made any observation with respect to the merits or demerits of the claim raised by the petitioner herein.
8. The petition stands disposed of in aforesaid term.
JUDGE AUGUST 28, 2024