IREO GRACE REALTECH PVT LTD v. SAKSHI ABRAHAM & ANR

Delhi High Court · 29 Aug 2024 · 2024:DHC:6607
Manoj Jain
CM(M) 3237/2024
2024:DHC:6607
consumer petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The High Court dismissed the petition under Article 227, directing the petitioner to first exhaust statutory remedies before seeking judicial intervention against consumer commission orders.

Full Text
Translation output
CM(M) 3237/2024 1
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 29th August, 2024
CM(M) 3237/2024 & CM APPL. 48976-48978/2024
IREO GRACE REALTECH PVT LTD .....Petitioner
Through: Ms. Roohe Hina Dua
WITH
Mr. Ankit Khera and Ms. Ruchi Kumar, Advocates.
VERSUS
SAKSHI ABRAHAM & ANR. .....Respondents
Through: Mr. Aditya Paralia
WITH
Mr. Akshay Srivastava and Mr. Suryansh Vashisht, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
JUDGMENT
(oral)

1. Present petition has been filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India impugning order dated 15.04.2024 as well as order dated 15.07.2024 passed by State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Delhi in a consumer complaint filed by the respondents herein.

2. As per the scheme of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, it cannot be said that the petitioner is rendered remediless as it can always invoke jurisdiction of Hon’ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in terms of Section 51 and 58 of the said Act.

3. It will be, therefore, appropriate if the petitioner invokes said jurisdiction before invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of CM(M) 3237/2024 2 Constitution of India.

4. The petition is accordingly, disposed of in the aforesaid terms and petitioner is at liberty to explore the above said legal option available to it.

5. Needless to say, all rights and contentions of the parties are reserved.

JUDGE AUGUST 29, 2024