Jitender Kumar v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Delhi High Court · 03 Sep 2024 · 2024:DHC:6715
Anoop Kumar Mendiratta
CRL.M.C. 4904/2024
2024:DHC:6715
criminal petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of process.

Full Text
Translation output
CRL.M.C. 4904/2024
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 03.09.2024
CRL.M.C. 4904/2024
JITENDER KUMAR .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Jagmohan Singh Khera, Advocate
WITH
petitioner-in-person.
VERSUS
STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents
Through: Mr. Tarang Srivastava, APP for the State
WITH
SI Bharat, PS: Uttam Nagar and SI Mamta, PS: Dwarka, Sec.-23
WITH
R-2-in-person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA
JUDGMENT
ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J (ORAL)

1. Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (‘Cr.P.C.’) has been preferred on behalf of the petitioner for quashing of FIR No. 0650/2021, under Sections 498A/406 IPC, registered at PS: Uttam Nagar and proceedings emanating therefrom.

2. In brief, as per the case of the petitioner, marriage between petitioner and respondent No. 2 was solemnized according to Hindu Rites and ceremonies on 27.07.2009. A male child was born out of the wedlock, who is presently in custody of respondent No. 2. Due to matrimonial differences, petitioner and respondent No. 2 started living separately. On complaint of respondent No. 2, present FIR was registered on 16.08.2021.

3. The disputes are stated to have been amicably settled between the parties in terms of settlement deed dated 05.08.2023 arrived at Counselling Cell, Family Court, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi. The marriage between petitioner and respondent No. 2 has been dissolved by decree of divorce by CRL.M.C. 4904/2024 way of mutual consent under Section 13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act vide judgment dated 30.04.2024.

4. Learned APP for the State submits that in view of amicable settlement between the parties, she has no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed.

5. Petitioner and respondent No. 2 are present in person and have been identified by SI Bharat, PS: Uttam Nagar. I have interacted with the parties and they confirm that the matter has been amicably settled between them without any threat, pressure or coercion. Respondent No. 2 also states that nothing remains to be further adjudicated upon between the parties and she has no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances, since the matter has been amicably settled between the parties, no useful purpose shall be served by keeping the case pending. It would be nothing but an abuse of the process of Court. The chances of conviction are bleak in view of amicable settlement between the parties. Consequently, FIR No. 0650/2021, under Sections 498A/406 IPC, registered at PS: Uttam Nagar and proceedings emanating therefrom stand quashed. Petition is accordingly disposed of. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. A copy of this order be forwarded to learned Trial Court for information.

ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J SEPTEMBER 03, 2024