Nawal Kishore Khandelwal v. Anuradha & Ors.

Delhi High Court · 20 Sep 2024 · 2024:DHC:7300
Manoj Jain
CM(M) 758/2022
2024:DHC:7300
civil petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the petition challenging dismissal of an Order VII Rule 11 application with liberty to raise issues at trial and directed expeditious disposal of the suit.

Full Text
Translation output
CM(M) 758/2022 1
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 20th September, 2024
CM(M) 758/2022 & CM APPL. 33641/2022
NAWAL KISHORE KHANDELWAL .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Ravi Kapoor
WITH
Ms. Aditi Singhal, Advocates
WITH
petitioner in person.
VERSUS
ANURADHA & ORS. .....Respondent
Through: Mr. A C David David, Advocate for R-1.
Mr. Pradeep Kumar, Advocate for R-3.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
JUDGMENT
(oral)

1. Petitioner is defendant No. 1 and during the course of the proceedings of the suit, he filed an application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC which was, however, dismissed.

2. Such order is under challenge.

3. Learned counsel for petitioner states that since the suit is already progressing and the issues have already been framed, he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition while reserving his right to agitate all those issues before the learned Trial Court at the stage of final arguments.

4. He also prays that the learned Trial Court be also requested to expedite CM(M) 758/2022 2 the trial.

5. Mr. A C David, learned counsel for respondent No. 1 (plaintiff before the learned Trial Court) has also no objection in this regard.

6. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of as not pressed.

7. All the rights and contentions of the parties are reserved.

8. Liberty, as prayed above, is granted.

9. Learned Trial Court is also requested to expedite the disposal of the aforesaid suit.

JUDGE SEPTEMBER 20, 2024