Full Text
Translation output
f) t I7 it HIGH COURT OF DELHI RC.REV.72l20tl
SANJEEV ANAND & ANR DELHI
Through: Mr. Atul Nigam & Mr. VEISUS..... Petitioners
Arbinda Nayak, Advocates PS PAUL ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Amit Punj, Advocate
SANJEEV ANAND & ANR DELHI
Through: Mr. Atul Nigam & Mr. VEISUS..... Petitioners
Arbinda Nayak, Advocates PS PAUL ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Amit Punj, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. BHASIN
'h 18.05.2011 Both the petitioners have filed their separate underlakings in compliance of the direction to that effect given on 4tl' May,2011. Counsel for respondent does not point o3t fly deficiency in the undertaking and says that he has no objection
At* \-- if the same i3 accepted. Ordered accordingly. Now petition stands disposed of as not pressed.
MAY 18,2011ipg \t 2011:DHC:18600
'h 18.05.2011 Both the petitioners have filed their separate underlakings in compliance of the direction to that effect given on 4tl' May,2011. Counsel for respondent does not point o3t fly deficiency in the undertaking and says that he has no objection
At* \-- if the same i3 accepted. Ordered accordingly. Now petition stands disposed of as not pressed.
MAY 18,2011ipg \t 2011:DHC:18600
JUDGMENT