Full Text
Translation output
$-39 ^ HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C. 1292/2011 & Crl.M.A. 4823/2011 (stay)
SHAMMI KHAN & ORS. Petitioners
Through Mr. Abdul Sattar, Adv. with Petitioners in person.
CRL.M.C. 1292/2011 & Crl.M.A. 4823/2011 (stay)
SHAMMI KHAN & ORS. Petitioners
Through Mr. Abdul Sattar, Adv. with Petitioners in person.
VERSUS
STATE GOVT. OF NOT OF DELFII & ANR Respondents
Through Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP for state with Mr. Girraj Singh, SI PS Badarpur.
Complainant/ R-2 in person.
Through Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP for state with Mr. Girraj Singh, SI PS Badarpur.
Complainant/ R-2 in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
18.05.2011 This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 51/2004 under Sections
498A/406 IPG registered at PS Badarpur, New Delhi.
The complainant/Respondent No. 2 Ms. Shabana is present in person and is identified by the Investigating Officer. She states that the Petitioners and Respondent No.2/Complainant have entered into a Compromise. In terms of the settlement, marriage between the Petitioner No. 1 and
Respondent No. 2/complainant has been dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consent. She statesthat she has no claim whatsoever of any kind
18.05.2011 This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 51/2004 under Sections
498A/406 IPG registered at PS Badarpur, New Delhi.
The complainant/Respondent No. 2 Ms. Shabana is present in person and is identified by the Investigating Officer. She states that the Petitioners and Respondent No.2/Complainant have entered into a Compromise. In terms of the settlement, marriage between the Petitioner No. 1 and
Respondent No. 2/complainant has been dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consent. She statesthat she has no claim whatsoever of any kind
CRL.M.C. 1292/2011
2011:DHC:14660 of maintenance, alimony etc. left against the petitioners. She fiarther states that in view of the settlement between the parties, she does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR andthe proceedings pursuant thereto.
In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be sei-ved in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
Consequently, FIR No. 51/2004 under Sections 498A/406 IPG registered at PS, Badarpur, New Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed.
Parties have signed this order sheet in acloiowledgment of their statements before this Court.
The petition and thepending application are disposed of. Order dasti.
MAY 18, 2011 'ga' MUKTA GUPTA,J 1292/2011 page 2 of2 yJ0] M
01^ a f\ cU)V\ HP —
L
-Ho 2011:DHC:14660
2011:DHC:14660 of maintenance, alimony etc. left against the petitioners. She fiarther states that in view of the settlement between the parties, she does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR andthe proceedings pursuant thereto.
In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be sei-ved in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
Consequently, FIR No. 51/2004 under Sections 498A/406 IPG registered at PS, Badarpur, New Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed.
Parties have signed this order sheet in acloiowledgment of their statements before this Court.
The petition and thepending application are disposed of. Order dasti.
MAY 18, 2011 'ga' MUKTA GUPTA,J 1292/2011 page 2 of2 yJ0] M
01^ a f\ cU)V\ HP —
L
-Ho 2011:DHC:14660
JUDGMENT