Full Text
Translation output
%
% 23.05.2011
Present: Mr. K.K. Manan and Mr. Nipun Bhardwaj, Advs. for the petitioners along with petitioners in person.
Mr. U.L. Watwani, APP for the State along with SI
Girraj Singh, P.S. Badar Pur.
Respondent no. 2 in person.
+ Crl. M.C. No. 1655/2011
*
Petitioners and respondent no. 2 are neighbors. A quairel took place between them which has resulted in registration of the present FIR under Sections 326/34 IPG on the complaint of respondent no. 2 against the petitioners at Police Station
Badarpur. Being neighbors, after buiying their hatches, petitioners and respondent no. 2 have now settled their disputes amicably, inasmuch as, they want to maintain harmonious relations in future with each other. Respondent no. 2, who is present in Gourt and has been identified by the Investigating
Officer, submits that he is not willing to pursue his complaint any further in view of the settlement arrived at between him and the petitioners.
Keeping in mind that both the parties have settled their disputes amicably, no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping the criminal proceedings pending. Having regard to the totality of the circumstances, in the larger interest, FIR NO. 604/2004 under Section 326/34 IPG registered at Police Station
2011:DHC:10564 r
Badarpur and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Dasti.
May 23, 2011 ga
A.K. PATHAK, J.
2011:DHC:10564
Present: Mr. K.K. Manan and Mr. Nipun Bhardwaj, Advs. for the petitioners along with petitioners in person.
Mr. U.L. Watwani, APP for the State along with SI
Girraj Singh, P.S. Badar Pur.
Respondent no. 2 in person.
+ Crl. M.C. No. 1655/2011
*
Petitioners and respondent no. 2 are neighbors. A quairel took place between them which has resulted in registration of the present FIR under Sections 326/34 IPG on the complaint of respondent no. 2 against the petitioners at Police Station
Badarpur. Being neighbors, after buiying their hatches, petitioners and respondent no. 2 have now settled their disputes amicably, inasmuch as, they want to maintain harmonious relations in future with each other. Respondent no. 2, who is present in Gourt and has been identified by the Investigating
Officer, submits that he is not willing to pursue his complaint any further in view of the settlement arrived at between him and the petitioners.
Keeping in mind that both the parties have settled their disputes amicably, no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping the criminal proceedings pending. Having regard to the totality of the circumstances, in the larger interest, FIR NO. 604/2004 under Section 326/34 IPG registered at Police Station
2011:DHC:10564 r
Badarpur and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Dasti.
May 23, 2011 ga
A.K. PATHAK, J.
2011:DHC:10564
JUDGMENT