Mukesh Aggarwal v. State of NCT of Delhi

Delhi High Court · 23 May 2011 · 2011:DHC:10244
V.K. Shali
CRL.M.C. 138/2011
2011:DHC:10244
criminal petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The High Court dismissed the petition under Section 482 CrPC as infructuous after the trial court clarified that the petitioner was inadvertently summoned.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C. 138/2011
MUKESH AGGARWAL ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. R.R. Kumar, Adv.
VERSUS
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Navin Sharma, APP
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALl
23.05.2011 Crl.
M.A. No. 6122/2011
ORDER

1. This is an application filed by the petitioner under Section 482 Cr.

P. C. The present petition has infructuous on account of the fact that the learned Trial Court has clarified vide order dated 18.03.2011 that the present petitioner was inadvertently summoned. So far as the main accused Mr. J aspal Singh proprietor of M/ s Avtar Engineering is concerned, he has been convicted on the basis of the plea bargain.

2. In view of the averments made in the application and the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. MAY KP....~, / 23,2011 V.K. SHALI,J ---~ ---..!..