Full Text
Translation output
. \
V . •
$-36 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C. 627/2011
SANJEEV ANAND & ORS Petitioners
Through Mr. RakeshMalhotra, Adv.
V . •
$-36 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C. 627/2011
SANJEEV ANAND & ORS Petitioners
Through Mr. RakeshMalhotra, Adv.
VERSUS
STATE & ORS Respondents
Through Mr. Pawan Bahl, APP for State.
Mr. Abhimanyu Devraj, Adv. for R-2 with complainant/R-2 in person.
Through Mr. Pawan Bahl, APP for State.
Mr. Abhimanyu Devraj, Adv. for R-2 with complainant/R-2 in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
18.05.2011 This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 533/2006 under Sections
498A/406/34 IPG registered at PS Timar Pur, Delhi.
The complainant/Respondent No. 2 Ms. Lalita @ Meetu is present in person and is identified by her counsel. She states that the Petitioners and
Respondent No.2/Complainant have entered into a Compromise. In terms of the settlement, marriage between the Petitioner No. 1 and Respondent NO. 2/complainant has been dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consent on September, 2010. In full and final settlement of all
18.05.2011 This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 533/2006 under Sections
498A/406/34 IPG registered at PS Timar Pur, Delhi.
The complainant/Respondent No. 2 Ms. Lalita @ Meetu is present in person and is identified by her counsel. She states that the Petitioners and
Respondent No.2/Complainant have entered into a Compromise. In terms of the settlement, marriage between the Petitioner No. 1 and Respondent NO. 2/complainant has been dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consent on September, 2010. In full and final settlement of all
CRL.M.C. 627/2011
2011:DHC:14630 the claims of the Respondent No. 2, the Petitioner No. 1 has paid ^
2,75,000/. She has received the entire amount. She further states that in view of the settlement between the parties, she does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the
I same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
Consequently, FIR No. 533/2006 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at PS Timar Pur, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed.
Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements before this Court.
The petition is disposed of. Order dasti.
'MUKTA GUPTA,J MAY 18, 2011 CRLM.C.S2W2011 page 2 of2
2011:DHC:14630
2011:DHC:14630 the claims of the Respondent No. 2, the Petitioner No. 1 has paid ^
2,75,000/. She has received the entire amount. She further states that in view of the settlement between the parties, she does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the
I same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
Consequently, FIR No. 533/2006 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at PS Timar Pur, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed.
Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements before this Court.
The petition is disposed of. Order dasti.
'MUKTA GUPTA,J MAY 18, 2011 CRLM.C.S2W2011 page 2 of2
2011:DHC:14630
JUDGMENT