Ranjeet Kaur v. State

Delhi High Court · 24 May 2011 · 2011:DHC:10490
V. K. Shali
CRL.M.C. 1583/2011
2011:DHC:10490
criminal petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn with directions to the investigating agency to file the charge sheet within two months due to delay in investigation.

Full Text
Translation output
) s-38
* IN THE HIGII COURT
+ CRL.M.C. 1583 /20II
RAN.]EET KAUR
OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Through Mr.
VERSUS
..... Petitioncr
Sanjeev Bhardawaj, Adv.
STATE ..... Respondent
Through Mr.N.Sharma, APP
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI
24.Os.20LL
After brief submissions, the learned counsel for the petitioner has sought permission to withdrav the present petition subject to the condition that as the FIR was registered on 18.12.2OO9 and despite expiry of IYz years, the charge sheet has still not bcen filed and therefore, directions be given to the investigating agency to file the charge sheet within a reasonable time.
Thc learned APP on instructions from the IO has assured the Court that the investigations in the matter are at an advanced stage and every cffort will be made to file the charge sheet within two months from today.
In vicw of the statement made by the learned counsel for the parties, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the directions to the investigating agency to file the charge sheet within two months as stated by them. No order as to cost.
"/" i.
'2.
-> '.
3.
MAY 24,2OL1l RN.K. SHALI,J
2011:DHC:10490
JUDGMENT