Full Text
Translation output
/o HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C. 1022/2011
ANIL ..... Petitioner
Through:Mr. Vinod Kumar, Adv.
CRL.M.C. 1022/2011
ANIL ..... Petitioner
Through:Mr. Vinod Kumar, Adv.
VERSUS
STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Samrat Nigam, Adv.
Through: Mr. Samrat Nigam, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALl
19.05.2011 Learned counsel for the respondent has made a statement at bar that the bill amount which was raised on account of theft of electricity against the petitioner amounting toRs. 31872.98 ps. has actually been paid by the petitioner. It has been further stated that on account of the aforesaid amount having been paid, they have no objection in case the
FIR No. 352/2000, under Section 39/41 of the Electricity Act, 2003 read with Section 379 IPC registered by PS Okhla Indl. Area and the criminal proceedings pending before Sh. Deepak Sherawat, learned MM, Saket, New Delhi are quashed.
In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondent and the fact that the petitioner has already paid the bill amount, I feel that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the case pending. Accordingly, the aforesaid FIR No. 352/2000, under
Section 39I 41 of the Electricity Act, 2003 read with Section 379 IPC
~ I :;-I ~ ;,-.-;
-'< ~ ·;-! "-,.:_, 2011:DHC:14646 ----- registered by PS 0 khla Indl. Area and the criminal proceedings pending before Sh. Deepak Sherawat, learned MM, Saket, New Delhi are quashed.
However, this shall be subject to the condition that the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.5,000 j- by way of cost with Delhi High Court Legal
Services Committee and the original receipt of the same be submitted before the Trial Court on the next date of hearing.
MAY
Rs ~ / 19,2011 r~ V.K. SHALI,J ~ i n :,:
:~ ' :~ ' ';
---' i.
- ' ' I r;-! ' ' '--' 2011:DHC:14646
19.05.2011 Learned counsel for the respondent has made a statement at bar that the bill amount which was raised on account of theft of electricity against the petitioner amounting toRs. 31872.98 ps. has actually been paid by the petitioner. It has been further stated that on account of the aforesaid amount having been paid, they have no objection in case the
FIR No. 352/2000, under Section 39/41 of the Electricity Act, 2003 read with Section 379 IPC registered by PS Okhla Indl. Area and the criminal proceedings pending before Sh. Deepak Sherawat, learned MM, Saket, New Delhi are quashed.
In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondent and the fact that the petitioner has already paid the bill amount, I feel that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the case pending. Accordingly, the aforesaid FIR No. 352/2000, under
Section 39I 41 of the Electricity Act, 2003 read with Section 379 IPC
~ I :;-I ~ ;,-.-;
-'< ~ ·;-! "-,.:_, 2011:DHC:14646 ----- registered by PS 0 khla Indl. Area and the criminal proceedings pending before Sh. Deepak Sherawat, learned MM, Saket, New Delhi are quashed.
However, this shall be subject to the condition that the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.5,000 j- by way of cost with Delhi High Court Legal
Services Committee and the original receipt of the same be submitted before the Trial Court on the next date of hearing.
MAY
Rs ~ / 19,2011 r~ V.K. SHALI,J ~ i n :,:
:~ ' :~ ' ';
---' i.
- ' ' I r;-! ' ' '--' 2011:DHC:14646
JUDGMENT