Full Text
Translation output
-4.
o/o 24.O5.2OLI
Present: Mr. Avadh Bihari Kaushik, Adv. for the petitioner.
Mr. M.P. Singh, APP for the State.
Mr. V.P. Katiyar and Mr. R.K. Mishra, Advs. respondent No. 2.
Mr. U. Jain, Adv. for respondent No. 3.
+ Crl. M.C. No. 294l2O11
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that'petitioner had been working with respondent No. 3 between February, 2010 to
June, 2OIO. Petitioner was neither the proprietor/partner nor autlnorized signatory of respondent No. 3. The cheque in question has been signed by accused No. 2 Ms. Bharti Chawla. It is contended that even in the complaint designation of the petitioner has not been mentioned. As.per the complaint itself, petitioner was working with respondent No. 3. At this stage, learned counsel for respondent No. 2, ort instructions, submits that respondent No. 2 is not willing to pursue the complaint against the petitioner and his name may be deleted. Accordingly, complaint qua the petitioner is quashed.
Petition is disposed of in the above terms. N t\
Cy4/-u a
May 24,2OLLlrb
A.K. PATHAK, J.
2011:DHC:10252
Present: Mr. Avadh Bihari Kaushik, Adv. for the petitioner.
Mr. M.P. Singh, APP for the State.
Mr. V.P. Katiyar and Mr. R.K. Mishra, Advs. respondent No. 2.
Mr. U. Jain, Adv. for respondent No. 3.
+ Crl. M.C. No. 294l2O11
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that'petitioner had been working with respondent No. 3 between February, 2010 to
June, 2OIO. Petitioner was neither the proprietor/partner nor autlnorized signatory of respondent No. 3. The cheque in question has been signed by accused No. 2 Ms. Bharti Chawla. It is contended that even in the complaint designation of the petitioner has not been mentioned. As.per the complaint itself, petitioner was working with respondent No. 3. At this stage, learned counsel for respondent No. 2, ort instructions, submits that respondent No. 2 is not willing to pursue the complaint against the petitioner and his name may be deleted. Accordingly, complaint qua the petitioner is quashed.
Petition is disposed of in the above terms. N t\
Cy4/-u a
May 24,2OLLlrb
A.K. PATHAK, J.
2011:DHC:10252
JUDGMENT